Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For example, in the process of proving that $$\left({\frac{f}{g}}\right)'\left({a}\right)= \frac{f'\left({a}\right)g\left({a}\right)-f\left({a}\right)g'\left({a}\right)}{\left[{g\left({a}\right)}\right]^{2}}$$ I'd like to tidy things up a bit by writing $$\left({\frac{f}{g}}\right)'\left({a}\right)= \left[\frac{f'\cdot g-f\cdot g'}{{g}^{2}}\right]\left({a}\right).$$ I believe that this is true, but I'm not confident why it is true: what assumptions am I making in rewriting this way, and is there a name for this change of notation?

share|improve this question
    
Since I'm not quite sure how to describe the notational step I'm taking, I could also use some help with the title. –  raxacoricofallapatorius Nov 13 '11 at 1:29
1  
Note that you have already taken the notational step in the left hand side of your first expression. To avoid it, you might start: $\text{If }h(a)=\dfrac{f(a)}{g(a)}\text{ then }h'(a)=\cdots$ –  Henry Nov 13 '11 at 1:40
1  
I apologize to raxa for the false information. –  analysisj Nov 13 '11 at 2:06
    
@analysisj: No problem! –  raxacoricofallapatorius Nov 13 '11 at 2:07
1  
Wow, none of us noticed the sign error in the original question (or my answer, until I fixed it) :) –  leslie townes Nov 13 '11 at 2:30
show 2 more comments

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

(Reposting my comment as an answer)

It is just a change in perspective, from thinking of the value of the derivative as a numerical expression in the values of the functions $f$ and $g$ at $a$, to the value of the single function $\frac{f' \cdot g - f \cdot g'}{g^2}$ at $a$. So in the second you emphasize the algebra of functions ($\cdot$, $−$, etc. are operations on functions) instead of numbers.

I don't know a name for this, but it is totally OK (if your audience is familiar with operations on functions). I should emphasize it is a notational difference only; it doesn't "do" anything in a proof.

share|improve this answer
    
So is it fair to say that the re-expression is a more precise way of proceeding, since the subsequent manipulations on $\left({\frac{f}{g}}\right)'\left({a}\right)$ will rely most directly on the algebra of functions and not of numbers? –  raxacoricofallapatorius Nov 13 '11 at 2:19
    
They are equally "precise" (when the functional one works at all, i.e. all values are taken at the same $a$), but one can be more convenient than the other. Going back and forth between them at will is a useful skill. –  Henning Makholm Nov 13 '11 at 2:21
    
I wouldn't say that it's more "precise", it is just a change in perspective. One advantage it has--- not in a proof of the quotient rule, but elsewhere--- is that you can suppress the $a$ entirely: $(\frac{f}{g})' = \frac{f' g - f g'}{g^2}$ makes perfectly good sense in the algebra of functions (and maybe emphasizes the generality of the rule). In a proof of a quotient rule, most of the work is in showing that it makes sense to write $(\frac{f}{g})'(a)$ in the first place--- i.e. that a certain limit exists. You probably shouldn't write $(\frac{f}{g})'(a)$ before then. –  leslie townes Nov 13 '11 at 2:26
    
And (again, just to confirm my understanding) I need to be very careful when I "suppress $a$". In cases like the one illustrated, for example, there is an additional requirement that both $f$ and $g$ are differentiable at $a$ (and, in fact, that $g(a)\neq 0$), so I'm either going to have to leave the $(a)$, or make a not somewhere that what I'm doing only works when this conditions are satisfied. Correct? –  raxacoricofallapatorius Nov 13 '11 at 16:12
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.