Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $m_\lambda(X_1,X_2,...X_N)$ be a monomial symmetric function with partition $\lambda$.

For example:

$$ m_{(3,1,1)}(X_1,X_2,X_3) =X_1^3X_2X_3 + X_1X_2^3X_3 + X_1X_2X_3^3 $$

Is there a general formula for roots of $m_\lambda$ if $X_j$ is restricted to elements of $\mathbb C$ with $\| X_j \|=1$?

share|improve this question
    
Could you define what is a symmetric monomial with partition $\lambda$ ? –  user18119 Nov 12 '11 at 22:39
    
Ah sorry, that's not very good explained. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetric_polynomial –  draks ... Nov 12 '11 at 23:03
1  
"monomial" means one term; what you have are polynomials. –  Gerry Myerson Nov 13 '11 at 3:25
2  
The usual term is not a "symmetrical monomial", it is a "monomial symmetric function". –  Phira Nov 13 '11 at 12:48

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

I doubt it. Let's look at $m_{(1,0,0,0,0)}$. You want the solutions of $$a+b+c+d+e=0$$ with all variables on the unit circle. It will be hard enough to find a formula for that special case, much less for the general case.

Note that $m_{(1,0)}$ is $a+b=0$ which is solved by $a=e^{it}$, $b=e^{i(t+\pi)}$. Then $m_{(1,0,0)}$ is $a+b+c=0$, which forces $a,b,c$ to be vertices of an equilateral triangle. Next, $m_{(1,0,0,0)}$ is $a+b+c+d=0$, and with a bit of work you can show that $a,b,c,d$ must be vertices of a rectangle. But once you get up to 5 unknowns the geometric argument doesn't give you anything that simple.

share|improve this answer
    
staying geometrically this linear example, this means that the barycentre is at the origin, right? –  draks ... Nov 17 '11 at 14:47
    
I guess so. The barycenter of a finite number of points is just their average, right? If the sum is zero, then certainly the average is zero. –  Gerry Myerson Nov 17 '11 at 23:38
    
I agree. What we be an extension to the barycenter in non-linear cases? For quardatic terms the objects we deal with are planes then, right? –  draks ... Nov 18 '11 at 12:13
    
Not sure I follow you. $m_{(2,0)}$ gets us $a^2+b^2=0$ which is still a one-dimensional problem. –  Gerry Myerson Nov 19 '11 at 11:05
    
hm, right, maybe I was confused by the squares... –  draks ... Nov 22 '11 at 6:58

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.