Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $I$ is a compact topological space, $m$ is a positive regular Borel measure. Then $L^\infty(m)$ is a standard example of commutative $W^\ast$-algebra (von Neumann algebra), but it is also a commutative $C^\ast$-algebra, so it should be isomorphism with $C(I)$. I can not believe that $L^\infty(m)$ is isomorphic to $C(I)$, who can tell me what happens?

share|improve this question
5  
Who says it is the same $I$? Take the simplest non-trivial example: $I = [0,1]$ with Lebesgue measure. Then $C(I)$ is separable while $L^{\infty}(I)$ isn't. The statement is that there exists a compact space $X$ such that $L^{\infty}(I) \cong C(X)$. Looking at the proof of the Gel'fand-Neumark theorem will tell you what $X$ you can take. It is huge (it can't be metrizable, as the space of continuous functions on a compact metrizable space is separable). It turns out that $X$ is an extremally disconnected space –  t.b. Nov 12 '11 at 10:43
    
Another interesting example is the spectrum of the unital commutative $C^*$-algebra of bounded continuous functions $X\to\mathbb C$ for some locally compact non-compact Hausdorff space $X$. –  Rasmus Nov 12 '11 at 11:53
    
@t.b.: Post as an answer? –  Nate Eldredge Nov 12 '11 at 13:15
    
@Nate: sure, done. –  t.b. Nov 12 '11 at 23:48

1 Answer 1

up vote 8 down vote accepted

Your notation indicates that you seem to assume that $L^{\infty}(m) = C(I)$. This can't be true, of course. Consider Lebesgue measure on $I = [0,1]$. Then $C(I)$ is a separable algebra while $L^{\infty}[0,1]$ is non-separable, so the two can't be isomorphic. Note also that $L^{\infty}(m)$ contains many functions that aren't equal to a continuous function almost everywhere.

Recall what the Gelfand representation theorem says: Given a commutative and unital $C^{\ast}$-algebra $A$, let $\hat{A} = \{\varphi:A \to \mathbb{C}\,:\,\varphi\text{ is a nonzero homomorphism}\}$ be its space of characters, which is a compact Hausdorff space when equipped with the weak$^{\ast}$-topology. The map $\operatorname{ev}: A \to C(\hat{A})$ given by $\operatorname{ev}_a (\varphi) = \varphi(a)$ is an (isometric) $\ast$-isomorphism.

Since von Neumann algebras are either finite-dimensional or non-separable, the space $\hat{A}$ is only metrizable in trivial cases, since $C(K)$ is separable for compact metrizable spaces $K$. It turns out that a commutative $C^\ast$-algebra $A$ is a von Neumann algebra if and only if its spectrum $\hat{A}$ is a hyperstonian space. In particular, the spectrum of a von Neumann algebra is extremally disconnected in the sense that the closure of an open set is open. This indicates that the spectrum of a commutative von Neumann algebra must be huge.

If the measure $m$ is non-atomic and $A = L^{\infty}(m)$, you don't even have a natural map $I \to \hat{A}$ (you can't evaluate an equivalence class of bounded measurable functions at a point $x \in I$), so the space $\hat{A}$ has little to do with the space $I$ itself (in fact, it only depends on the measure algebra of $(I,m)$). As I argued above, the natural map $C(I) \to L^{\infty}(m)$ is typically not surjective. This map need not be injective either (since the measure $m$ need not be everywhere supported).

Finally, as Rasmus points out, the Gelfand representation theorem can be used to construct the Stone–Čech compactification of a locally compact space $X$. Namely, let $A = C_b(X)$ be the commutative unital $C^{\ast}$-algebra of bounded continuous functions on $X$. Then $\hat{A} = \beta X$ together with the map that sends $x$ to the evaluation at $x$ can be shown to satisfy the universal property of the Stone–Čech compactification. This leads us to the simplest example of a non-discrete hyperstonian space: the Stone–Čech compactification $\beta\mathbb{N}$ of $\mathbb{N}$ which is the spectrum of $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{N})$ (you can get $\ell^{\infty}(\mathbb{N})$ as $L^{\infty}(m)$ by taking a measure on $I = [0,1]$ having countably many atoms whose weights sum up to $1$).

For all this, and much more, I recommend Pedersen's Chapter IV of Analysis Now for an efficient but accessible exposition. If you want to dig deeper, have a look at Volume 1 of Takesaki's Theory of operator algebras. Also, you may want to have a look at the Wikipedia article on abelian von Neumann algebras.

share|improve this answer
    
Great answer. These results sort of show that in many "intuitive" senses, spaces like $\ell^{\infty}(\mathbb{N})$ aren't of the form $C(X)$, for the reason that our intuition for how topological spaces "ought to be" often imposes more structure/niceness than is present in the $X$'s one needs to resort to in the Gelfand-Naimark correspondence. (I am no set theorist, but I have heard that what you can prove about spaces like $\beta \mathbb{N}$ depends strongly on what you add to set theory beyond choice. There is a sense in which one cannot really "get one's hands on" these spaces.) –  leslie townes Nov 13 '11 at 2:15
    
Thanks! I agree with what you say. Concerning your parenthetical remark: a good idea of what's possible under different assumptions is given in J. van Mills's contribution An introduction to $\beta\omega$ to the Handbook of set theoretic topology. –  t.b. Nov 13 '11 at 2:59
    
Great!Thank you. –  Strongart Nov 14 '11 at 7:03

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.