Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose I have a real vector space $V$ and I would like to extend the scalar multiplication in such a way that I obtain a complex vector space. It is not difficult to see that doing so is equivalent to fixing some linear map $U : V \to V$ satisfying $U^2 = -1$ and then defining $(a + ib)x = ax + bUx$ for $a+bi \in \mathbb{C}$ and $x \in V$. The next natural question is "when does such a map $U$ exist"? The answer is "always", provided $V$ is even-dimensional or infinite dimensional. To see this, take a basis for $V$ and split it into two collections of equal cardinality $(x_i)_{i \in I}$ and $(y_i)_{i \in I}$. Then define $Ux_i = y_i$, $Uy_i = -x_i$ and extend linearly.

But what if I have a real-Banach space $X$? Can I extend the scalar multiplication while ensuring that $X$ becomes a complex Banach space under the original norm? Clearly I need to take $U$ to be an isometry. More specifically, what we'd need is a $U$ satisfying $$ \|ax + bUx\|^2 = (a^2 + b^2) \|x\|^2 $$ for all $a,b \in \mathbb{R}$, $x \in X$.

I suppose this is possible if $X$ is some real Hilbert space $H$ (of even or infinite dimension). One just uses the same trick as in the algebraic case with an orthonormal basis instead instead of a Hamel basis.

Are there any other nontrivial sufficient (or necessary) conditions for a real Banach space to be a complex Banach space in which we have forgotten how to multiply by imaginary scalars?

share|cite|improve this question
In the real Banach space $c_0$, for example, this can't be done: for any $x$ and $y$ in $c_0$ , $\|x + t y\|$ is a piecewise linear function of $t$. – Robert Israel Nov 11 '11 at 2:03
up vote 7 down vote accepted

There are many cases where this fails if one insists upon on keeping the original norm (i.e., the isometric version of this problem). A clearly necessary condition for the space to have a complex structure isometrically is that the group of real-linear isometries is uncountable, in particular that it contains a subgroup isomorphic to the multiplicative group of complex numbers of modulus $1$. On the other hand, the/one reason complexification under the original norm fails so often is that every real Banach space can be equivalently renormed so that its group of real-linear isometries is just the two element group $\{ Id_X,\, -Id_X \}$; this fact is due to Jarosz, in Any Banach space has an equivalent norm with trivial isometries, Israel J. Math, 64 (1988), 49-56 (obviously, no renorming is needed in the elementary case $X=\mathbb{R}$!). Others have since studied further what groups can be represented as the group of linear isometries on a Banach space; see, for example, the work of Ferenczi and Galego.

I will also mention that there is a notion of an extremely non-complex Banach space; not only do such Banach spaces fail to admit an operator $U$ satisfying $U^2=-Id$, but in fact every operator $T$ on such a space satisfies $\Vert Id+T^2\Vert = 1+\Vert T^2\Vert$. Properties and the existence of such spaces can be found in the joint work of Koszmider, Martin and Meri.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you for the interesting references! – Mike F Nov 11 '11 at 21:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.