Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am interested in the Fourier transform of a function of the form $f(x) = \exp(g(\exp(x)))$, where g has a "simple" form, for example $g(y) = \frac{(y-1)^2}{y^2 - 1}$.

Has anyone a starting point for this? I think it would be a good start to see how to do the Fourier transform with $g=id$. I couldn't find anything about that, though. Any pointers would be helpful.

share|improve this question
    
Your "simple" $g$ is always rational? –  J. M. Nov 10 '11 at 14:47
    
@J.M. yes, g is rational. Maybe that was my current definition of simple ;) –  Andreas Mueller Nov 10 '11 at 14:59

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The double exponential and in fact, the exponential function itself $f(x) = \exp (x)$ are not tempered distributions, and therefore they don't have Fourier transforms using classical techniques.

Basically, for the Fourier transform of a function $f$ to be defined, you need that the integral

$$ \int f(x) \exp(i\xi x) dx = \lim_{R\to\infty}\int_{-R}^Rf(x)\exp(i\xi x) dx $$

to converge. (This requirement can be relaxed if you are willing to consider "generalised functions"; the techniques in the linked Wikipedia article can be useful.) In your case a necessary condition for such integrals to converge is that $\lim_{y\to\infty} g(y) = -\infty$ and $\lim_{y\to 0}g(y) = -\infty$ (and they are not sufficient to guarantee the integral converges). So for $g = id$ or $g = \ln$ the integrals fail to converge. Even for the case $g(y) = \frac{(y-1)^2}{y^2 - 1}$, by looking at the limits you see that the Fourier integral will fail to converge.

On the other hand, when $g(y) = \frac{(y-1)^2}{y^2-1} = \frac{y-1}{y+1}$, since $|g(y)| \leq 1$ for $y > 0$, you have that $f(x) = \exp\circ g\circ\exp(x)$ is a bounded (but not decaying) function, and so is a tempered distribution, which means that its Fourier transform will also exist as a tempered distribution. But I don't think it has any nice representations as "simple" functions.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you for the answer. It definitely makes me understand my question better ;) I will look at the wikipedia article on tempered distributions. Sampling from the corresponding distribution would actually be enough for my case. –  Andreas Mueller Nov 10 '11 at 15:05
2  
Those are different distributions. –  Jonas Teuwen Nov 10 '11 at 15:19
2  
Unfortunately, "distribution" is an overloaded word in mathematics. Probability distributions are quite different from Schwartz distributions (the one relevant to the above discussion) and also are quite different from tangent distributions from differential geometry... –  Willie Wong Nov 10 '11 at 15:26

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.