Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

we throw 100 Points in range [0,1],

What ist the probability that more than 50 Points touch down in [0,0.2)?

E: "Point right" --> p= 0.2 F: "Point fail" ---> q= 0.8

Multinomial theorem P(X>=50) = 1 - P(X=49) this is to unlikely?

Where is my error in reasoning?

thx

share|improve this question
2  
Why multinomial? Binomial(n,p) with n=100 and p=0.2... –  Did Nov 9 '11 at 22:18
    
Virtually $0$. We have a binomial distribution, $100$ trials, probability of success $0.2$. Approximate with the normal mean $20$ variance $100(0.2)(0.8)=16$. So standard deviation is $4$, and $50$ is $7.5$ standard deviation units from the mean. Being $7.5$ standard deviation units or more to the right of the mean basically never happens. The approximation by the normal is pretty good, though it will underestimate tail probabilities. –  André Nicolas Nov 9 '11 at 22:21
    
hmm the cumulated binomial_table for n=100 and p=0.2 shows unsightly values.. –  corium Nov 9 '11 at 22:30
    
$P(x >50)=\sum_{k=51}^{100} \binom{100}{k}(0.2)^k(0.8)^{100-k}$. Wolfram Alpha has no trouble with this, gives about $5.18\times 10^{-12}$. Pretty unlikely. –  André Nicolas Nov 9 '11 at 22:37
    
is this not to incredible? –  corium Nov 9 '11 at 22:40

2 Answers 2

up vote 0 down vote accepted

Here on any trial, the probability of picking a point in $[0,0.2)$ is $0.2$. Call picking such a point a "success." Let the experiment be repeated $100$ times. If the random variable $X$ is the number of successes, then $X$ has binomial distribution. The probability that the number of successes is greater than $50$ is $$\sum_{k=51}^{100} \binom{100}{k}(0.2)^k(0.8)^{100-k}.$$ In the old days, the above sum would have been very unpleasant to compute. However, Wolfram Alpha computes this easily, and gives an answer of about $5.18\times 10^{-12}$.

Comment: In the post, there is the assertion that $P(X\ge 50)=1-P(X=49)$. That is not correct. Indeed $P(X \ge 50)$ is close to $0$, while $1-P(X=49)$ is close to $1$. But the following assertion would be correct. $$P(X \ge 50)=1-P(X\le 49).$$

By the way, Wolfram Alpha says that $P(X \ge 50)\approx 2.14\times 10^{-11}$. Thus $P(X=50)\approx 1.62\times 10^{-11}$. This is very small, of course, but about $3$ times as large as the probability that $X\ge 51$. That shows that the terms after $50$ are not only small, they also decay rapidly.

share|improve this answer

$\Pr(X\ge 50)= 1 - \Pr(X \le 49)$. This is not the same as $1-\Pr(X=49)$. It says "$\le$", not "$=$". It is equal to $\sum\limits_{u=0}^{49} \Pr(X=u)$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.