Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I try to show that $$ \int\limits_{R^3} \frac{e^{i\xi x} d\xi}{\xi^2 - k^2 - i0} = e^{ikx} \int\limits_{R^3} \frac{e^{i\xi x}d\xi}{\xi^2 + 2(k + i0\frac{k}{|k|})\xi}, \;\;\; k,x \in \mathbb R^3 $$ I tried to make the change $\xi \mapsto \xi + k$ in second integral. I obtained $$ \lim\limits_{\epsilon \to 0} \; \int\limits_{\mathbb R^d} \frac{e^{i\xi x} d\xi}{(\xi + i\epsilon \frac{k}{|k|})^2 - k^2 + \epsilon^2 - 2i|k|\epsilon} $$ So I don't know what to do...

share|cite|improve this question
Why write out $i0$? Isn't that just zero? – Thomas Andrews Nov 8 '11 at 19:59
$\xi^2-k^2 - i 0$ is a way of saying that you consider $\lim_{\epsilon \downarrow 0} \frac{e^{i\xi x} }{\xi^2 - k^2 - i \epsilon} \mathrm{d} \xi$. – Sasha Nov 8 '11 at 20:20
foil the square in the denominator ;) – N. S. Nov 8 '11 at 20:21

Stuff does work out in spherical coordinates. Let $\kappa >0 $ be such that $\kappa^2 = k^2$. Align north pole of spherical $\xi$-coordinates along $x$ vector. Let $\vert x \vert = \rho$. Then $ \xi \cdot x = r \rho \cos(\theta)$, and $\mathrm{d} \xi = r^2 \sin \theta \mathrm{d} r \mathrm{d} \theta \mathrm{d} \phi$: $$ \begin{eqnarray} \lim_{\epsilon \downarrow 0}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \frac{\mathrm{e}^{i\xi x} }{\xi^2 - k^2 - i \epsilon} \mathrm{d} \xi &=& \lim_{\epsilon \downarrow 0} \int_0^{2 \pi} \mathrm{d} \phi \int_0^\infty r^2 \mathrm{d} r \int_0^\pi \mathrm{d} \theta \, \sin(\theta) \cdot \frac{\mathrm{e}^{i r \rho \cos \theta} }{r^2 - \kappa^2 - i \epsilon} \\ &=& \lim_{\epsilon \downarrow 0} \left( 2 \pi \int_0^\infty r^2 \mathrm{d} r \frac{1}{r^2 - \kappa^2 - i \epsilon} \cdot \frac{2 \sin(r \rho)}{r \rho} \right) \\ &=& \lim_{\epsilon \downarrow 0} \left( 2 \pi \int_0^\infty r^2 \mathrm{d} r \frac{1}{r^2 - \kappa^2 - i \epsilon} \cdot \frac{2 \sin(r \rho)}{r \rho} \right) \\ &=& \lim_{\epsilon \downarrow 0} \left( \frac{2 \pi^2}{\rho} \mathrm{e}^{i \rho \sqrt{\kappa^2 + i \epsilon}} \right) = \frac{2 \pi^2}{\rho} \mathrm{e}^{i \kappa \rho} \end{eqnarray} $$

The integral with respect to $r$ was carried out my method of residues.

share|cite|improve this answer
thank you, but integral on the left I can compute too) – Nimza Nov 9 '11 at 12:40
@Nimza I am not understanding your comment. If this post not-helpful, or have you figured out a different way to compute the integral ? – Sasha Nov 9 '11 at 13:10
Rather it is not helpful because I wanted to show that integrals on the left and on the right are equal. I don't need to count integral on the left – Nimza Nov 9 '11 at 17:35
@Nimza Sorry, I missed your question, then. Notice that with formal substitution $\xi \to \xi + k + n \sqrt{\epsilon} \mathrm{e}^{i \pi/4}$, where $\vert n \vert =1$, the denominator on the l.h.s. becomes $ \xi^2 + 2 \xi \cdot \left( k + n \sqrt{\epsilon} \mathrm{e}^{i \pi/4} \right) + 2 k \cdot n \sqrt{\epsilon} \mathrm{e}^{i \pi/4}$. Now you should figure out why $n = \frac{k}{\vert k \vert}$ is a good choice. – Sasha Nov 9 '11 at 18:28
But we leave $R^3$ making this substitution – Nimza Nov 9 '11 at 19:52

$\newcommand{\+}{^{\dagger}} \newcommand{\angles}[1]{\left\langle\, #1 \,\right\rangle} \newcommand{\braces}[1]{\left\lbrace\, #1 \,\right\rbrace} \newcommand{\bracks}[1]{\left\lbrack\, #1 \,\right\rbrack} \newcommand{\ceil}[1]{\,\left\lceil\, #1 \,\right\rceil\,} \newcommand{\dd}{{\rm d}} \newcommand{\down}{\downarrow} \newcommand{\ds}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}} \newcommand{\expo}[1]{\,{\rm e}^{#1}\,} \newcommand{\fermi}{\,{\rm f}} \newcommand{\floor}[1]{\,\left\lfloor #1 \right\rfloor\,} \newcommand{\half}{{1 \over 2}} \newcommand{\ic}{{\rm i}} \newcommand{\iff}{\Longleftrightarrow} \newcommand{\imp}{\Longrightarrow} \newcommand{\isdiv}{\,\left.\right\vert\,} \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left\vert #1\right\rangle} \newcommand{\ol}[1]{\overline{#1}} \newcommand{\pars}[1]{\left(\, #1 \,\right)} \newcommand{\partiald}[3][]{\frac{\partial^{#1} #2}{\partial #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\pp}{{\cal P}} \newcommand{\root}[2][]{\,\sqrt[#1]{\vphantom{\large A}\,#2\,}\,} \newcommand{\sech}{\,{\rm sech}} \newcommand{\sgn}{\,{\rm sgn}} \newcommand{\totald}[3][]{\frac{{\rm d}^{#1} #2}{{\rm d} #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\ul}[1]{\underline{#1}} \newcommand{\verts}[1]{\left\vert\, #1 \,\right\vert} \newcommand{\wt}[1]{\widetilde{#1}}$ $\ds{\int_{{\mathbb R}^{3}}{\expo{i\vec{\xi}\cdot\vec{x}} \over \xi^{2} - k^{2} - \ic 0^{+}}\,d^{3}\vec{\xi}}$

Note that $\ds{\pars{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}^{2} = k^{2} + \ic 0^{+}}$ such that \begin{align} &\color{#c00000}{% \int_{{\mathbb R}^{3}}{\expo{i\vec{\xi}\cdot\vec{x}} \over \xi^{2} - k^{2} - \ic 0^{+}}\,d^{3}\vec{\xi}} =\int_{0}^{\infty}\dd\xi\, {4\pi\xi^{2} \over \xi^{2} - \pars{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}^{2}}\ \overbrace{\int\expo{i\vec{\xi}\cdot\vec{x}}\,{\dd\Omega_{\vec{\xi}} \over 4\pi}} ^{\ds{\sin\pars{\xi x} \over \xi x}} \\[3mm]&=2\pi\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} {\bracks{\xi^{2} - \pars{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}^{2}} + \pars{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}^{2}\over \xi^{2} - \pars{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}^{2}} \,{\sin\pars{x\xi} \over x\xi}\,\dd\xi \\[3mm]&={2\pi^{2} \over x} + 2\pi k^{2}\color{#00f}{\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} {1 \over \xi^{2} - \pars{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}^{2}} \,{\sin\pars{x\xi} \over x\xi}\,\dd\xi}\tag{1} \end{align}

\begin{align}&\color{#00f}{% \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{1 \over \xi^{2} - \pars{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}^{2}} \,{\sin\pars{x\xi} \over x\xi}\,\dd\xi} =\Im\,\pp\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{1 \over \xi^{2} - \pars{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}^{2}} \,{\expo{\ic x\xi} \over x\xi}\,\dd\xi \\[3mm]&=\Im\bracks{% 2\pi\ic\,{1 \over 2\pars{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}}\, {\exp\pars{\ic x\pars{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}} \over x\pars{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}} -\int_{\pi}^{0}{1 \over -\pars{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}^{2}}\,{\ic \over x}\,\dd\theta} \\[3mm]&={\pi \over x}\, \Re\pars{\expo{\ic\verts{k}x} \over \bracks{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}^{2}} -{\pi \over x}\,\Re\pars{1 \over \bracks{\verts{k} + \ic 0^{+}}^{2}} =\color{#00f}{{\pi \over xk^{2}}\bracks{\cos\pars{\verts{k}x} - 1}} \end{align}

Now, we'll replace this result in expression $\pars{1}$: $$ \color{#00f}{\large% \int_{{\mathbb R}^{3}}{\expo{i\vec{\xi}\cdot\vec{x}} \over \xi^{2} - k^{2} - \ic 0^{+}}\,d^{3}\vec{\xi} =2\pi^{2}\,{\cos\pars{\verts{k}x} \over x}}\,,\qquad\quad x = \verts{\vec{x}} $$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.