Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know you need to assume for a contradiction. The hard bit is the thing I can't do and that is show that if you do put $\mathbb{P}^2$ into $\mathbb{R}^3$ the path components of the complement are two pieces. I know from this it's an easy contradiction as then you would be able to orientate $\mathbb{P}^2$, which is impossible as it contains a Möbius strip.

Note, if you don't know what $\mathbb{P}^2$ is then it the sphere with the antipodal points equal i.e. same conguranchy

Also, is there a general pattern. Like can $\mathbb{P}^3$ be only embedded into $\mathbb{R}^5$

share|cite|improve this question
"Complement" with an "e" and "compliment" with an "i" are two different words that mean two different things. I've changed the spelling in the posting. – Michael Hardy Nov 8 '11 at 18:20
And here is a complementary comment: Bravo, Michael – Georges Elencwajg Nov 9 '11 at 20:02
And here is a complimentary comment: Bravo, Michael – Georges Elencwajg Nov 9 '11 at 20:02
up vote 3 down vote accepted

If you know homology, then use Alexander duality with $\mathbb Z_2$ coefficients. The reduced $0$th homology of the complement of $\mathbb{RP}^2$ is isomorphic to $H^2(\mathbb{RP}^2;\mathbb Z_2)\cong\mathbb Z_2$. That means that the complement has $2$ connected components.

You may also be interested in my answer to a more general question.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.