Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $G$ be a topological group. Define $H(g)=\{g^n\}^{\infty}_{n=-\infty}$ for each $g \in G$. I need to prove that the closure of the set $H(g)$ is a commutative subgroup of $G$. But I am not sure how to interpret the closure of $H(g)$.

I already appreciate your explanations

share|improve this question
    
    
@seaturtles How do you think about the closure of $H(g)$ without knowing about the topology of $G$ ? –  the8thone May 19 at 2:58

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

You have to assume that $G$ is Hausdorff, otherwise this does not work (see here).

Let $K$ be the closure of $H(g)$. Given $g,h\in K$, take nets $(g_\lambda)_{\lambda\in\Lambda}$ and $(h_\mu)_{\gamma\in\Gamma}$ in $H(g)$ such that $g_\lambda\to g$ and $h_\gamma\to h$. Since multiplication is continuous, the net $(g_\lambda h_\gamma)_{(\lambda,\gamma)\in\Lambda\times\Gamma}=(h_\gamma g_\lambda)_{(\lambda,\gamma)\in\Lambda\times\Gamma}$ (which is in $H(g)$, since it is a subgroup) converges to both $gh$ and $hg$, so $gh=hg\in K$ (by the Hausdorff property). This shows that $K$ is a commutative subgroup of $G$.

share|improve this answer

Let $G$ be a Hausdorff topological group. Consider the map $c:(x,y)\in G\times G\to xyx^{-1}y^{-1}\in G$. Since $c$ is clearly continuous, the set $X=c^{-1}(\{e\})$ is a closed subset of $G\times G$.

Now let $H\subseteq G$ be an abelian subgroup of $G$. Since $H$ is abelian, we can see at once that $H\times H\subseteq X$. But then $\overline H\times \overline H\subseteq\overline{H\times H}\subseteq X$, because $X$ is closed, and this means that $\overline H$, which is a subgroup of $G$, is also abelian.

Remark. To show that $\overline H$ is a subgroup of $G$ we can proceed similarly, as follows. Let $\alpha:(x,y)\in G\times G\mapsto xy^{-1}\in G$. We know that $\alpha(H\times H)\subseteq H$, so continuity of $\alpha$ implies that $\alpha(\overline H\times\overline H)\subseteq\alpha(\overline{H\times H})\subseteq\overline{\alpha(H\times H)}\subseteq\overline{H}$. Since $e\in\overline H$, this is enough to conclude that $\overline H$ is a subgroup.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.