Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am trying to show that the sup norm on $\mathbb{R}^2$ is not derived from the inner product on $\mathbb{R}^2$.

What I notice so far is that to suppose $\langle x,y\rangle$ is an inner product, not the dot product, and $|x| = \sqrt{\langle x,x\rangle}$. To compute $\langle x\pm y,x \pm y\rangle = \sqrt{(x \pm y)^2 + (x\pm y)^2}$. Also, what is special about saying $x=e_1$, and $y = e_2$?

share|cite|improve this question
In your second line .Do you mean $|x|^{2}=<x,x>$? – Hassan Muhammad Nov 5 '11 at 19:53
Yes, but an inner product is a type of dot product – Buddy Holly Nov 5 '11 at 20:14

Hint: If a norm comes from an inner product, then it satisfies the parallelogram identity.

share|cite|improve this answer
Where, and how, does that identity fit in here? – Buddy Holly Nov 5 '11 at 21:05
@Buddy: Show the sup norm does not satisfy the parallelogram identity by selecting suitable (cleverly chosen) vectors and showing the identity is false. That will prove the sup norm does not derive from an inner product. – Arturo Magidin Nov 5 '11 at 22:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.