Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Are integrals in analysis special cases of coends in category theory? They are both seen as weighted sums, denoted by $\displaystyle\int $ and share the same formal properties (for example Fubini's Theorem). Also notice that there is a very beautiful reformulation of the Yoneda Lemma $$F(a) = \int^{p \in I} \mathrm{Hom}(a,p) \otimes F(p)$$ for functors $F : I^{op} \to \mathcal{C}$ into a cocomplete category $\mathcal{C}$ which looks like the equation $$\mu(A) = \int_{p \in I} \chi_A(p) ~ d \mu(p)$$ for a measure $\mu$ on a measurable space $I$.

Notice that this question is not as silly as it seems: Limits in analysis can be seen as limits in category theory, see MO/9951 or Wikipedia (Topological limits).

If the measurable space $I$ is discrete, the question is about (infinite) series - are they special cases of coends?

share|cite|improve this question
Every colimit is a coend, namely $\varinjlim F = \int^{i : \mathcal{I}} F i$. – Zhen Lin May 8 '14 at 7:20
I'm pretty sure that what you wrote is the co-Yoneda lemma. The Yoneda lemma would be $F(a) = \int_{p \in I} [\hom(p,a), F(p)]$ (with covariant $F : I \to \mathcal{C}$ this time). – Najib Idrissi May 8 '14 at 7:20
Did you take a look at ? It does not answer your question about coends, but it might prove useful if you are interested in categorical integration... – Marco Vergura May 8 '14 at 7:21
@Najib: These are formally equivalent statements (look at $F^{op}$ etc.). – Martin Brandenburg May 8 '14 at 7:25
Of course, the name is pretty telling :). I simply wanted to point out that it has a different name and interpretation (in terms of presheaves and colimits of representable functors) under this form. – Najib Idrissi May 8 '14 at 7:29

Not an answer, but it was too long for a comment.

Lawvere "Metric spaces" paper relates the inner and outer measure on a probability space to Kan extensions (which can be written as ends/coends). This is p. 162:

As an example of the last corollary [see the paper], we could take for $X$ the space of nonnegative step functions of a probability space $S$ and for $Y$ the space of all nonnegative functions with the natural sup metric, and consider as $\varphi$ the elementary integral; thus in general we might call $y\in Y$ $\varphi$-integrable if [a certain right Kan extension, the inner measure] = [a certain left Kan extension, the outer measure].

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.