Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$x^2+1=0$ cannot be solved via real numbers.

Because of this, we extend the real numbers to complex numbers.We can solve $x^2+1=0$ and $x^2+x+1=0$ equations after we define complex numbers.

I wonder if we can solve all equations ( includes only the functions that are analytic.) via complex numbers or not? If It is yes, how can we prove that claim?

For example: Can $z^{100}-5z+2=e^{i.\operatorname{erf}(z)}$ be solved via complex numbers?

where $\operatorname{erf}(x) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_{0}^x e^{-t^2}\,\mathrm dt$

Note: This is just an example, I am not wondering the solution for a special example, I am wondering if a general proof is possible or not.

Update: I mention the functions that are analytic. $\bar z$ or $\Re{(z)}$ are not analytic functions.

Thanks for answers.

share|cite|improve this question
You can solve any equation $p(z)=0$ , where $p(z)$ is a polynomial with Complex coefficients, and $z$ is a Complex variable, but not all functional equations. How do you define $erf(z)$ ? – user99680 May 5 '14 at 7:03
@user99680 erf(z) is an just example that equation can be very hard to see solution. I could write much more longer , I want to see general proof for analytic function equations . – Mathlover May 5 '14 at 7:08
Consider $e^z=0$ – leonbloy May 5 '14 at 16:15
There are some nice proofs of Picard's little theorem here – Mike Miller May 8 '14 at 16:03
Maybe that is work opening a new question. Something along the lines of "What is the most elementary proof of little Picard's theorem?" or similar. – 5xum May 9 '14 at 13:47
up vote 23 down vote accepted

All polynomial equations with non-constant polynomials with complex coefficients can be solved with complex numbers. This is the fundamental theorem of algebra. Link here.

All equations in general can not. For example, $z\bar z = -1$ has no solutions in $\mathbb C$.

In general, if you are asking if every equation $f(z) = 0$ has a solution in $\mathbb C$, you are asking if every function $f:\mathbb C\to\mathbb C$ has $0$ in its range (codomain). This is of course not true. There are many many functions which do not have $0$ in their codomain, of which $z\bar z+1$ is only one. There exist much uglier functions with this property, for example $$f(z)=\begin{cases}z&\text{ if } z\neq 0\\1&\text{ if } z=0\end{cases}.$$

Even all analytic functions do not contain $0$ in their codomain. For example, $f(z) = e^z$ does not hit $0$ at any point, meaning $e^z=0$ has no solution. However, in some way, analytic functions are the correct way to go. Because of Picard's little theorem also mentioned in the comments (Link) you know that if $f$ is entire (analytic and everywhere defined) and non-constant, then $f(z) = w$ has at least one solution for all values of $w$ except perhaps one. For example, $e^z=w$ has a solution (infinitely many of them) for all values of $w$ except $0$.

Edit: The fact that $f$ is not constant is a valid demand to make, of course, since if a function is constant, the equation $f(z)=0$ translates to $C=0$ for the constant value $C$ of $f$, and such equations are of little interest.

share|cite|improve this answer
if we do not use $\bar z$???. I mention we will use just analytic functions. – Mathlover May 5 '14 at 7:04
"has $0$ in its range" (rather than domain). – Andrés E. Caicedo May 5 '14 at 7:11
Well, if the equation is analytic and everywhere defined (which are sensible conditions) we have Picard's theorem, which tells us that essentially all equations do have solutions! – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez May 5 '14 at 7:12
You've left out the vital restriction that the function not be constant. $f(z) = 1$ only has solutions to $f(z)=w$ for one value of $w$. – user2357112 May 5 '14 at 10:38
@Taemyr No, user2357112 was correct as I should point out that $f$ is not constant when quoting Picards theorem. I edited my answer. – 5xum May 5 '14 at 10:49

The idea of "all equations" is somewhat cloudy: What are admissible equations in the context of this question?

Consider the equation $$f(z):=\sqrt{4+z^2}- \log z=0\ .$$ Here $f$ is not uniquely defined in all of ${\mathbb C}$. It would be difficult to make general statements about the existence of solutions if such equations are admitted.

However, according to Picard's Theorem we can say the following: If $f:\ {\mathbb C}\to{\mathbb C}$ is a nonconstant entire analytic function then the equation $$f(z)=c$$ has at least one solution for every given $c\in{\mathbb C}$, with the exception of at most one $\>c\in{\mathbb C}$. As an example consider the exponential function $f(z):=e^z$, which does not take the value $c=0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.