Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a PDF of X defined as $f(x) = e^{-x}\text{ for } x \geq 0,$ 0 otherwise, and a RV $Y$ defined as X if X $\leq 1$, and $\frac{1}{X}$ if X>1. I need to find a pdf of Y. I graphed Y versus X, and can see that Y varies from 0 to 1, the curve goes as y=x for x between 0 and 1, and $\frac{1}{x}$ from 1 onwards. Could someone show how to get to the pdfs? I tried doing pdf of y = $F_x(t)' + F_x(\frac{1}{t})'$ at t between 0 and 1, but I don't know -- should I be adding them or subtracting them? This is in preparation for the test tomorrow morning, many thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
For every $y$ in $(0,1)$, write the event $[Y\leqslant y]$ as the union of two disjoint events involving $X$ only. Deduce from this the value of $F_Y(y)=\mathrm P(Y\leqslant y)$. – Did Nov 2 '11 at 7:54
@DidierPiau: I think I got to that step in my thought process -- every y in 0, 1 can come from either x=y or 1/x = y. But I am not sure how to deduce the pdf described above. I do not want to deduce the distribution function because our teacher emphasizes finding PDFs by differentiating dist functions of the original variable, and not doing the integration.. – fasthelp Nov 2 '11 at 8:00
You go too fast and hit a wall without realizing it... Note that I did not mention $x=y$ or $x=1/y$ for $y$ in $(0,1)$. Sticking to what I wrote, did you write $[Y\leqslant y]$ as a union? (Not $[Y=y]$, mind you, but $[Y\leqslant y]$.) If you do that, you will realize your $F_X(t)+F_X(1/t)$ is not relevant. – Did Nov 2 '11 at 8:12
The question said $f(x)=e^{-x} x \ge 0$. I changed it to $f(x)=e^{-x} \text{ for }x \ge 0$. It seems that was probably intended since otherwise "$\ge 0$" wouldn't have been there. – Michael Hardy Nov 2 '11 at 11:06
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Here's one way. For $0<y\le1$, $$ \begin{align} f_Y(y) & = \frac{d}{dy} F_Y(y) = \frac{d}{dy}\Pr(Y\le y) = \frac{d}{dy}\Pr\left( X \le y \text{ or }X\ge\frac1y \right) = \frac{d}{dy}\left( (1-e^{-y}) + e^{-1/y} \right) \\ \\ & = e^{-y} + \frac{e^{-1/y}}{y^2}. \end{align} $$

(And of course $f_Y(y) = 0$ if $y>1$ or $y<0$.)

share|cite|improve this answer

I think that You should use following formula:

$f_Y(y)=|\frac{1}{g'(x)}|f_X(x)$ , where $Y=g(X)$

$a)$ $x<0 , f_X(x)=0 , g(x)=x$

$f_Y(y)=1 \cdot 0=0$

$b)$ $x\in [0,1] , f_X(x)=e^{-x} , g(x)=x$

$f_Y(y)=1 \cdot e^{-x}=e^{-x}$

$c)$ $x>1 , f_X(x)=e^{-x} , g(x)=\frac{1}{x}$

$f_Y(y)=\frac{1}{x^2} \cdot e^{-x}$

share|cite|improve this answer
For $y>1$, the density $f_Y(y)$ is $0$. You're running into complications resulting from the fact that $Y$ is not a one-to-one function of $X$. When $X>1$, the other variable $Y$ is still $<1$. The bottom line seems to be that the two functions you come up with, $e^{-x}$ and $e^{-x}/x^2$ should be added together when $0<x<1$, and you should get $0$ when $x>1$ or $x<0$. – Michael Hardy Nov 2 '11 at 11:40
But $\frac1{x^2}e^{-x}$ does not enter the picture. – Did Nov 2 '11 at 13:00
@Didier You're right: $\frac{1}{x^2}e^{-\text{something}}$ does enter the picture. My examination of this posting didn't get as far as that exponent. – Michael Hardy Nov 2 '11 at 13:13

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.