Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If $A\in \mathbb R^{n \times m}$ and $A = A^\top$ and if $\vert \lambda_1 \vert >\vert \lambda_2 \vert >\cdots>\vert \lambda_n \vert >0$ then $\lim\limits_{k\to \infty} Q_k = I$, $\lim\limits_{k\to \infty} R_k = \mathrm{diag}(\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_n) $ and $(A_{k})_{i,j} = O\left(\left(\dfrac{\vert \lambda_{i} \vert}{\vert \lambda_{j} \vert}\right)^k\right)$ for $i > j$.

Okay. I find it hard to understand the last part:

$(A_{k})_{i,j} = O\left(\left(\dfrac{\vert \lambda_{i} \vert}{\vert \lambda_{j} \vert}\right)^k\right)$ for $i > j$.

Is there someone who can explain what it means?

share|improve this question
    
Your acceptance rate is rather low, especially considering that some of your questions received several quite detailed answers. Please take into account that accepting answers not only acknowledges the work others have put into answering your questions, but also marks the questions as answered so they don't keep floating around and being revisited as unanswered questions. –  joriki Nov 1 '11 at 18:52
    
Regarding the present question, the top part seems to indicate that you know how to use $\TeX$ here. Has it escaped your notice that the second part is mangled? You will generally find that people are willing to invest time into answering your questions if they get the impression that you're willing to invest time into them yourself. –  joriki Nov 1 '11 at 18:53

1 Answer 1

up vote 0 down vote accepted

It's more or less just explaining the convergence rate of the QR algorithm. Remember that the endgame for the QR algorithm is to construct the Schur decomposition, $\mathbf A=\mathbf Q\mathbf T\mathbf Q^\top$, where $\mathbf T$ is triangular and $\mathbf Q$ is orthogonal. In the case you're considering, $\mathbf A$ is symmetric ($\mathbf A=\mathbf A^\top$), and thus $\mathbf T$ is the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues.

With this in mind, one expects that with every successive orthogonal similarity transformation, the off-diagonal elements ought to converge to zero. The statement that you were puzzling about just says that the rate of decrease of the off-diagonals roughly follows a decaying exponential, with the base for each element depending on the ratios of the matrix's eigenvalues.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.