Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

We know that how a single definition $i^2=-1$ revolutionized our mathematics and solved many many problems. I wonder whether the definition $|p|=-1$ could have the potential of creating a new generation of numbers and help us in other areas like complex numbers do(from geometry to calculus).

Has anyone researched on it?

Please add appropriate tags.

share|cite|improve this question
This question is somewhat related:… – Alex Petzke Apr 30 '14 at 12:57
up vote 17 down vote accepted

There is a difference here.

The value $i$ is defined as the number that solves the equation $x^2+1=0$. The reason that this equation does not have a solution in $\mathbb R$ is that for every $x\in\mathbb R$, $x^2>0,$ which is a consequence of the properties of the real numbers. There is nothing inherit in the equation that would demand it to have no solution.

On the other hand, the value $|x|$ is defined to always be positive, thus it will by definition never equal to $-1$.

The difference then:

  • $x^2>0$ is a consequence of the properties of real numbers. Looking at numbers with different properties may change this fact.
  • $|x|>0$ is inherit in the definition of $|\cdot|$. It is a property that must hold for all numbers, even if we expand our set.
share|cite|improve this answer
What if there could be a better definition of || which we now just know as a special case? – evil999man Apr 30 '14 at 9:25
That is of course possible, but I do not know of any way in which that would be useful. – 5xum Apr 30 '14 at 9:43
So based on the second sentence in your answer, I would like to ask you a similar question then: Can we define a number $j$ that solves the equation $\frac{1}{x}=0$? In fact, I will post it as a question myself... – barak manos Apr 30 '14 at 9:54
I think it's misleading to nonsensical to say that the positiveness of $|\cdot|$ "must hold" no matter how we extend it. Absolute value is simply not defined on any other set, so by extending it we have to just make up a definition. There's absolutely nothing stopping you from defining it to be negative on some other set. I don't think that the distinction you're describing is real, it's just a subjective difference. – Jack M Apr 30 '14 at 11:24
@JackM That is more or less exactly 5xum's point. – Taemyr Apr 30 '14 at 11:26

You can indeed modify the absolute value in $\Bbb Q$ to construct completions of it which are structurally very different from $\Bbb R$. This is how to define the $p$-adic numbers which depend on a preliminary choice of a prime number $p$. Nonetheless, even these "exotic" absolute values are always non-negative valued.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.