Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Following is problem 1.1.9(b) in Problems in Mathematical Analysis II.

Show that if in a deleted neighborhood of zero the inequalities $f(x)\ge|x|^{\alpha}$, $\frac12<\alpha<1$, and $f(x)f(2x)\le|x|$ hold, then $\lim_{x\to0}f(x)=0$.

The given solution used $|x|^{\alpha}\le f(x)\le\frac{|x|}{|2x|^{\alpha}}$ and concludes that $\lim_{x\to0}f(x)=0$ (probably by the Squeeze Theorem). My question is, why do we need $\frac12<\alpha<1$? Is $0<\alpha<1$ not enough?

share|cite|improve this question

For concreteness, we look, for example, at $\alpha=1/4$. But the issue described below comes up for any positive $\alpha \le 1/2$.

The same argument as the one you gave yields $$|x|^{1/4} \le f(x) \le \frac{∣x∣^{3/4}}{2^{1/4}}.$$

When $0<|x|<1$, the above inequality cannot hold, since $|x|^{1/4}>|x|^{3/4}$. So it would be strange to hypothesize that it holds in a deleted neighbourhood of $0$.

It is technically correct to say that if $0<\alpha<1$, and if the inequality holds, then $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}f(x)=0$. However, the part of the result that deals with $0<\alpha\le 1/2$ is not interesting, since there is no $f$ that satisfies the inequality,

share|cite|improve this answer
    
I see.. Thanks a lot! – noob Oct 31 '11 at 11:00

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.