Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $f$ be a continuous function on $\mathbb R$ such that $\lim_{x\to 0} f(\frac{1}{x})$ exists. Show that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $\mathbb R$.

My proof is as follows:

Let $n = \frac{1}{x}$ and $\lim_{r\to \infty} f(n)$ = $l$.

There exists a $M$ such that if $n \geq M$, $|f(n) - l|<\epsilon$.

Suppose $f$ is not uniformly continuous on $\mathbb R$.

Then for all $\epsilon > 0$, there exists a $\delta$ such that for some n, u belonging to R, $|n-u|<\delta$ $\implies$ $|f(n) - f(u)| \geq \epsilon$. Pick $u = M$, then f0r any $n$ such that $|n-u|<\delta$, we have $|f(n) - l| \geq \epsilon$. Contradiction.

Hence, $f$ is uniformly continuous.

I don't really know how to prove this. Can someone help please. Thanks

share|improve this question
1  
No, this really does not work. The second line of your proof makes no sense (what is $\epsilon$?). More seriously, the statement "$f$ is not uniformly continuous" is nothing at all as what you wrote. The negation of "for all $t$ exists $y$, $P(t,y)$" is not "for all $t$ exists $y$, not $P(t,y)$". –  Andres Caicedo Apr 24 at 6:19
    
that is what my textbook write, battle introduction to real analysis –  user136266 Apr 24 at 7:18
    
ok is not "for any n,u", but "some n,u" –  user136266 Apr 24 at 7:19
    
    
@MartinSleziak: I'd argue that it's not just related, it's pretty much a duplicate (after one line of reasoning). –  Najib Idrissi Apr 25 at 10:54

2 Answers 2

(This is a relatively high-level answer, which may not be helpful to the OP but hopefully explains the underlying phenomenon at work.)

The condition that $\lim\limits_{x\to 0}f(1/x)$ exists means that we can extend $f$ to a continuous function on the one-point compactification of $\mathbb R$, and by compactness this extension (and hence $f$) is uniformly continuous.

Explicitly: Let $L=\lim\limits_{x\to 0}f(1/x)$. Define $g:S^1\to \mathbb R$ by $$g(\theta)=\begin{cases} f(\tan(\theta/2)) &\text{if } -\pi<\theta<\pi\\ L &\text{if } \theta=\pm \pi \end{cases}$$ Then $g$ is continuous, since $f$ and $\tan$ are continuous and as $\theta\to \pm \pi$ we have $\cot(\theta/2)\to 0$ so $$\lim\limits_{\theta\to \pm \pi}f\left(\frac{1}{\cot(\theta/2)}\right)=\lim\limits_{x\to 0}f(1/x)=L$$ and since $S^1$ is compact, it follows that $g$ is uniformly continuous. But $f = g(2\arctan(x))$ so is a composition of uniformly continuous functions, thus is uniformly continuous.

share|improve this answer

Note: This is tthe negation of uniform continuity of a function $f:\Bbb R\rightarrow\Bbb R$:

There exists $\varepsilon>0$ such that for each $\delta>0$ there exists $x,y\in\Bbb R$ such that $|x-y|<\delta$ and $|f(x)-f(y)|\geq\varepsilon$.

Proof: Now, let be $L=\lim_{x\rightarrow0} f(1/x)$. Let be $\varepsilon>0$. Then, there exists $\delta>0$ such that for each $x\in(-\delta,\delta)-\{0\}$ we have $|f(1/x)-L|<\varepsilon/2$.

Take a natural number $n>(1/\delta)+1$. Then, $f$ is uniformly continuous in the compact set $[-n,n]$ so there exists $\delta'\in(0,1)$ such for each $x,y\in[-n,n]$, if $|x-y|<\delta'$ then $|f(x)-f(y)|<\varepsilon$.

Now, take $x,y\in\Bbb R$ such that $|x-y|<\min(\delta,\delta')$. Let $A=(-\infty,-1/\delta)\cup(1/\delta,\infty)$. Let $B=[-n,n]$. We have tree options:

  • If $x,y\in A$, then $$|f(x)-f(y)|\leq|f(x)-L|+|f(y)-L|<\frac\varepsilon2+\frac\varepsilon2=\varepsilon$$
  • If $x,y\in B$, then $|f(x)-f(y)|<\varepsilon$, as we have already proved.
  • If, for example, $x\in A$ and $y\in B$, one of them is in $A\cap B$, so this is actually one of the former options. Indeed, suppose that $x\notin B$. Then we have that $|x|>1/\delta$ and $|x|>n$. Since $y\in B$, $|y|\leq n$. Then, $$|y|>|x|-|y-x|>n-\delta'>\frac1\delta+1-\delta'>\frac1\delta$$ so $y\in A\cap B$.
share|improve this answer
    
why when we take $n > \frac{1}{\delta} +1$, then f is uniformly continuous? –  user136266 Apr 25 at 0:24
    
i can't really understand the your first case, can you explain more please thanks –  user136266 Apr 25 at 0:33

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.