Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X$ be the number that shows up when rolling a die. Now throw another dice $X$ times $(Y_1, ..., Y_X)$ and calculate the sum $Z = \sum_{k=1}^X Y_k$.

What kind of Stochastic Process is this? How do you calculate mean value and variance of $Z$?

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

Look up Wald's Lemma. This lemma is applicable here as $X$ and $Y_k$ are independent. Variance also can be found using this lemma and using the fact that $Z^2=\sum_{k=1}^{X}Y_k^2+\sum_{i<j}Y_i Y_j$ where we have $X(X-1)/2$ terms in the second sum.

share|improve this answer
    
Does this help find the variance? –  opt Oct 28 '11 at 6:42
    
Yes, so long as $X$ and $Y_k$ are independent which is actually the case here. –  Ashok Oct 28 '11 at 7:49
    
@Ashok Thank you for the answer. However, I wonder why the Wikipedia article does not mention that independence of X and Y_k is necessary. –  artistoex Oct 28 '11 at 15:26
    
Condition (3) is essentially saying about the amount of dependence is allowed. See the discussion of assumptions below the statement in the Wikipedia page. –  Ashok Oct 29 '11 at 3:03
add comment

It is a compound probability distribution.

You can marginalize by taking the average of the six pmfs, giving a distribution that looks like $p(1) = 1/6^2,\dots, p(36) = 1/6^7$ and then you can find the variance of this finite marginal distribution directly. For the mean you can just take the mean of the six distribution means.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your random variable is also a branching process $(Z_n)$ observed at time $n=2$, where the offspring distribution is given by a single roll of the die. You want to substitute $n=2$ below, where $\mu$ and $\sigma^2$ are the mean and variance for a single die roll $$\mathbb{E}(Z_n)=\mu^n\quad\mbox{ and }\quad\mathbb{V}(Z_n)={\sigma^2\mu^n(\mu^n-1)\over\mu^2-\mu}.$$

share|improve this answer
    
Glad to know this interpretation! –  Ashok Oct 28 '11 at 13:46
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.