Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This one comes from Folland, Real Analysis, Problem 33 in the section titled Modes of Convergence.

Suppose $f_n \geq 0$ and $f_n \rightarrow f$ in measure, then $\int f \leq \liminf \int f_n$.

So I notice a few things first off, that since $f_n \to f$ in measure, we can find a subsequence $f_{n_j}$ which converges pointwise almost everywhere (Theorem 2.30 in Folland), and for this subsequence we may say (by Fatou's lemma using $f_n \geq 0$) that $\int f \leq \liminf \int f_{n_j}$, but it's not necessarily true that $\liminf \int f_{n_j} \leq \liminf \int f_n$, or at least I don't see how to prove it (and in general this is not true for any sequence and subsequence, while the reverse inequality is, I think).

Any tips, hints, or solutions?

share|improve this question
    
Looking at $\lim \inf f_n$ or $\lim \sup f_n$ should help. –  N. S. Oct 27 '11 at 21:38
3  
Assume that the conclusion is wrong. You can find a subsequence $\{f_{n_k}\}$ such that $\liminf \int f_n d\mu =\lim_{k\to +\infty}\int f_{n_k}d\mu$. Now, extract from this subsequence an almost everywhere converging subsequence, and Fatou's lemma yields a contradiction. –  Davide Giraudo Oct 27 '11 at 21:43
1  
possible duplicate of Fatou's Lemma and Almost Sure Convergence (Pt. 2) –  t.b. Oct 27 '11 at 22:33
    
inf can only get smaller for a larger set so your supposition that $\liminf \int f_n \leq \liminf \int f_n_j$ is true. –  user9352 Nov 3 '11 at 12:22
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

You can pass to a subsequence $f_{n_k}$ with $\int f_{n_k} \to \liminf \int f_n$ first.

This subsequence will also converge to $f$ in measure and ... then you already know what to do.

share|improve this answer
    
and....Fatou. (in other words, the comment was more helpful, but I'll mark it as an answer anyway) –  JeremyKun Oct 27 '11 at 23:14
    
@Bean: Well, I didn't want to write down a complete solution, since I was under the impression that you would appreciate a hint - maybe it was not that great a hint, since it gave away too much..? (in other words, the comment came only after I had already posted this answer, but I'll gladly accept your marking my answer anyway ;) ) –  Sam Oct 27 '11 at 23:37
    
Good point. the hard part was passing to the subsequence anyway, so I appreciate it. –  JeremyKun Oct 28 '11 at 1:23
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.