Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Below is a proof that straight lines cannot exist in the coordinate plane. Where is the flaw in its reasoning?

It will be shown that the equation of a straight line leads to a mathematical inconsistency. First, write the equation of the line in the form Ax+By=C, where A, B, and C are scalars. Second, choose variables u and v so that u=Ax+By and v is any arbitrary non-constant function of x and y. The equation of the line in the uv-plane can be written as u=C. Differentiate implicitly to achieve the equation 1=0, which is a mathematical inconsistency and hence the line cannot exist in the first place.

share|cite|improve this question
The explanation is very similar to "suppose we have $x=1$ but if you derive it you will get $1=0$." How can that be? – Oria Gruber Apr 22 '14 at 15:47
This easily generalizes to disproving the existence of circles and hyperbolas. – Alex R. Apr 22 '14 at 16:29
The equation $u=C$ of the line is not an assertion that $u$ is equal to $C$, so it doesn't follow that some derivative of $u$ is equal to that derivativve of $C$. If $u$ was identical to $C$, then the derivative of $u$ with respect to any variable (note that then $u$ would not be variable) would be $0$, not $1$. – Steve Kass Apr 22 '14 at 16:33

$u=C$ means $u$ is constant

so after differentiation it should be

$0=0$ not $1=0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.