Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When reading the proof for Dirichlet's Approximation Theorem, I came across the following statement:

If $x$ is irrational, then $nx - [nx]$ are distinct for all $n \in \mathbb{Z}$.

I don't really understand why. Can someone explain to me, preferably with a proof. Thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Suppose $nx-[nx]=mx-[mx]$. Then $$(n-m)x=[nx]-[mx]\in\mathbb{Z}$$ But an integer multiple of an irrational number can only be an integer if it is $0$, so we must have $$n=m$$ Therefore it is distinct for all $n$.

share|cite|improve this answer

We have to prove that for distinct $i,j, \{ix \} \ne \{jx\}$ where $\{x\}$ denotes the fractional part and $x$ is irrational.

If $\{ix\} = \{ij\}$, then $ix-ij = \lfloor ix \rfloor - \lfloor ij \rfloor$ or $x = \frac{\lfloor ix \rfloor - \lfloor ij \rfloor}{i-j} \in \mathbb{Q}$ which is a contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.