Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Sorry for my bad English.

Define f(x)=0 when x=0;

This is a problem that our calculus teacher mentioned in the class, but now I'm not sure if I correctly understand it.

In my opinion,

as long as $\alpha$ > 0, according to squeeze theorem´╝î The limit of f(x) at x=0 would be 0, and the function would be continuous at x=0;

As for 1th derivable, if $\alpha$ > 1, there would be lim(x->0) (f(x)-0*x)/x = 0 thus the derivative is 0 at x=0. However if x <= 1, lim(x->0) f(x)/x doesn't exist ,thus f(x) is not derivable at x=0;

And I guess if x > n (where n is integer), the function would be n th derivable.

Did I get the point or I made some mistake?

In addition, I came across a quite similar problem in multivariable calculus that is


I wonder are they almost the same? Or there might be some subtle difference?

share|cite|improve this question

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.