Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Multiplying fractions is a regular occurance. If those fractions are considered slopes, does it make any sense?

For example, if these fractions are slopes,$\frac{9}{8} \times \frac{49}{48},$ does the product have meaning in terms of slope?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 15 down vote accepted

Sure. Let $f(x)=ax+b, g(x)=cx+d$. Then the slope of $f(g(x))$ is $ac$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks, What would one be trying to show if one did this? In the example above, two rising slopes become one steeper rising slope. Does that have meaning anywhere? – Fred Kline Apr 18 '14 at 14:08
The product of two rising (i.e., positive) slopes isn't necessarily steeper: $\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{4}$. – Joshua Taylor Apr 18 '14 at 15:26
@FredKline If you remove the translation factor (so that you're dealing with functions whose graphs are lines through the origin), then this becomes a special case of what happens when you compose linear transformations. The phenomenon is that composing linear transformations is the same thing as multiplying numerical data describing those transformations in the appropriate way. The numerical data are the matrices corresponding to the transforms, and the correct notion of multiplication is matrix multiplication. In other words, what you've hit on runs deeper than one might originally expect. – Nick Apr 18 '14 at 18:29
This is related with the chain rule for differentation as well :) – Ruben Apr 18 '14 at 18:52

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.