Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $u=(-R_2\theta,R_1\theta)$ where $R_1,R_2$ are the usual Riesz Transforms in $\mathbb{R}^2$, $\mathbb{T}^2$ denotes the torus, $\theta\in C^{\infty}(\mathbb{T}^2)$ and $-\theta=(-\nabla)^{\frac{1}{2}}\psi=\Lambda\psi$. How do I show that $$-\int_{\mathbb{T}^2}\Lambda\psi(\nabla^{\perp}\psi\nabla\phi)dx=\int_{\mathbb{T}^2}\nabla^{\perp}\psi\Lambda(\psi\nabla\phi)dx.$$

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Let's write the integrand in components: $$ \Lambda\psi(-\partial_2\psi\partial_1\theta+\partial_1\psi\partial_2\theta). $$ Now we integrate by parts (there are no boundary terms because of the periodicity) $$ \int \Lambda\psi(-\partial_2\psi\partial_1\theta+\partial_1\psi\partial_2\theta)=\int \partial_2(\Lambda\psi\partial_1\theta)\psi-\psi\partial_1(\Lambda\psi\partial_2\theta) $$ Developing the terms with parenthesis, we get $$ \int (\partial_2\Lambda\psi\partial_1\theta+\Lambda\psi\partial_2\partial_1\theta)\psi-\psi(\partial_1\Lambda\psi\partial_2\theta+\Lambda\psi\partial_1\partial_2\theta)=\int \psi\partial_2\Lambda\psi\partial_1\theta-\psi\partial_1\Lambda\psi\partial_2\theta $$ Writing in vectorial form: $$ -\int\Lambda\nabla^\perp\psi\nabla\theta\psi. $$ To conclude we use that $\Lambda$ is self-adjoint (to see this, you may use that the multiplier is a real valude function or equivalently, you may symmetrize the kernel expression)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.