Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I recall correctly, for $X$, $Y$ normally distributed, the ratio $X/Y$ is Cauchy-distributed. This is sort of like a power law, but isn't quite. So:

Are there any simple distributions for two RVs $X$, $Y$ s.t the ratio is really power-law distributed (at least in some regime)?

share|cite|improve this question
I like the question and upvoted it. But is there any motivation for the question? – Srivatsan Oct 21 '11 at 15:02
I have what appears to be such a data set (corroborated by MLE but I haven't done anything exhaustive). The fits appear excellent. However, it's a small enough data set that I can't easily ID plausible distributions for the ratio (these seem noisier when considered separately). – S Huntsman Oct 21 '11 at 18:31
@MikeWierzbicki See a more recent discussion here which indicates that the ratio of an exponential to a gamma is related to, but not quite, Pareto as Wikipedia claims – Dilip Sarwate Oct 26 '11 at 22:26
up vote 4 down vote accepted

As noted here, Wikipedia's answer to the question posed by the OP is not quite correct. If $X$ is a Gamma random variable with parameters $(n,1)$ and $Y$ is an exponential random variable with parameter $1$ and $X$ and $Y$ are independent random variables, then $Y/X$ is not a Pareto random variable, but $Z = Y/X + 1$ is:
$$P\{Z > z\} = P\{Y/X + 1 > z\} = z^{-n}~ \text{for}~ z > 1.$$ A common scale parameter $\lambda$ could be included in both variables, but since we are looking at ratios, the scale parameter cancels out, and it is convenient to set $\lambda = 1$.

Suppose that $X$ denotes the time of the $n$-th arrival after $t = 0$ in a Poisson process with arrival rate $1$. Then $X$ is a Gamma random variable with parameters $(n,1)$. Let $Y$ denote the additional waiting time for the $(n+1)$-th arrival. Then, $Y$ is an exponential random variable with parameter $1$ and is independent of $X$. Thus, we have the situation described in the previous paragraph. But notice that the $(n+1)$-th arrival time is just $W = Y + X$, and $Z = Y/X + 1 = (Y+X)/X = W/X$ is thus the ratio of the $(n+1)$-th and $n$-th arrival times, and is a Pareto random variable. Naturally $Z > 1$.

In summary, if $W$ and $X$ are the $(n+1)$-th and $n$-th arrival times in a (homogeneous) Poisson process, then $W/X$ is a Pareto $(1,n)$ random variable: $P\{W/X > a\} = a^{-n}$ for $a > 1$.

share|cite|improve this answer
+1 Nicely done. I didn't bother with fact-checking as my answer was meant more of a 'point-in-the-right-direction' rather than a 'here's-the-solution.' More wise advice from Dilip: fact-check your sources. – Mike Wierzbicki Oct 27 '11 at 3:57

According to Wikipedia, if $X\sim\mathrm{Exponential}(\lambda)$ and $Y\sim\Gamma (n, \frac{1}{\lambda})$, then $\frac{X}{Y}\sim$Pareto$(1,n)$.

NOTE: Wikipedia is not quite right on this one. See Dilip's response.

share|cite|improve this answer
Just a note of caution about notation: $E[X] = \frac{1}{\lambda}$ but $E[Y] = \frac{n}{\lambda}$, that is, in Wikipedia's notation, $X \sim \Gamma(1, \frac{1}{\lambda})$ while many other authors would say $X \sim \Gamma(1, \lambda)$ – Dilip Sarwate Oct 22 '11 at 2:08
Wise advice. Always check what notation is being used. – Mike Wierzbicki Oct 22 '11 at 3:13

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.