Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm trying to figure out how to derive the formula for an infinitesimal length $\mathrm dl$, specifically, the first formula in this Wikipedia section:

$$\mathrm d\mathbf r=\mathrm dr\hat{\boldsymbol r}+r\mathrm d\theta\hat{\boldsymbol \theta}+r\sin\theta\mathrm d\varphi\hat{\boldsymbol\varphi}\;,$$

where $\hat{\boldsymbol r}$, $\hat{\boldsymbol\theta}$ and $\hat{\boldsymbol\varphi}$ are mutually orthogonal unit vectors in the directions of increasing $r$, $\theta$ and $\varphi$, respectively.

If I could see a good diagram it would probably be enough, but I can't find any.

share|improve this question
    
To be able to rigorously derive the formula, you need to use the change of variables theorem and show that in the special case of spherical coordinates it yields the desired result; no pictures are needed. Indeed, according to C. H. Edwards, c.f, Advanced Calculus of Several Variables p 244, such pictures are "mythical" in any event. –  ItsNotObvious Oct 21 '11 at 1:55
    
I added the formula from the linked section. Questions should ideally be self-contained, so that they retain their value in the future despite changes in any content linked to. If you don't know how to achieve a certain result in $\TeX$, you can right-click on any formula on this site and select "Show Source" to see how it was done. –  joriki Oct 21 '11 at 6:09

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The general form of the formula you refer to is

$$\mathrm d\mathbf r=\sum_i\frac{\partial \mathbf r}{\partial x_i}\mathrm dx_i=\sum_i\left\lvert\frac{\partial \mathbf r}{\partial x_i}\right\rvert\;\frac{\frac{\partial \mathbf r}{\partial x_i}}{\left\lvert\frac{\partial \mathbf r}{\partial x_i}\right\rvert}\mathrm dx_i=\sum_i\left\lvert\frac{\partial \mathbf r}{\partial x_i}\right\rvert\;\mathrm dx_i\hat{\boldsymbol x}_i\;,$$

that is, the change in $\mathbf r$ is decomposed into individual changes corresponding to changes in the individual coordinates. To apply this to the present case, you need to calculate how $\mathbf r$ changes with each of the coordinates. With the conventions being used, we have

$$\mathbf r=\pmatrix{r\sin\theta\cos\varphi\\r\sin\theta\sin\varphi\\r\cos\theta}\;.$$

Thus

$$\frac{\partial\mathbf r}{\partial r}=\pmatrix{\sin\theta\cos\varphi\\\sin\theta\sin\varphi\\\cos\theta}\;,$$ $$\frac{\partial\mathbf r}{\partial \theta}=\pmatrix{r\cos\theta\cos\varphi\\r\cos\theta\sin\varphi\\-r\sin\theta}\;,$$ $$\frac{\partial\mathbf r}{\partial \varphi}=\pmatrix{-r\sin\theta\sin\varphi\\r\sin\theta\cos\varphi\\0}\;.$$

Then the desired coefficients are the magnitudes of these vectors:

$$ \begin{eqnarray} \left\lvert\frac{\partial\mathbf r}{\partial r}\right\rvert&=&1\;,\\ \left\lvert\frac{\partial\mathbf r}{\partial \theta}\right\rvert&=&r\;,\\ \left\lvert\frac{\partial\mathbf r}{\partial \varphi}\right\rvert&=&r\sin\theta\;. \end{eqnarray}$$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.