Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Here is the homework question, verbatim:

Find Borel functions $f,g: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ that agree on a dense subset of $\mathbb{R}$ but are such that $f(x) \neq g(x)$ holds at $\lambda$-almost every $x\in \mathbb{R}$

I interpreted the latter part to mean, "... holds $\lambda$-almost everywhere in $\mathbb{R}$."

I also understand $\lambda$ to actually be $\lambda^{\ast}$ - Lebesgue outer measure.

I also think the question says that $f(x) \neq g(x)$ holds $\lambda$-almost everywhere in $\mathbb{R}$ and means that for only a set of outer Lebesgue measure zero is it true that $f(x) = g(x)$. This latter set happens to be the dense subset of $\mathbb{R}$ mentioned in the problem.

So what I have so far is that $f(x) = g(x)$ on a set $A$ s.t. $\lambda \big(A:=\{x \in \mathbb{R} : f(x) = g(x) \}\big)=0$. So $A$ is dense, meaning that for any $x \in \mathbb{R}$, any neighborhood $N(x,\;\;\;) \ni $ (at least one point from $A$). This to me means that, since the interior of $int \; (A^c) = \varnothing$, only the points ${}^{\pm}\infty$ of the extended real number line is where these functions agree. But I don't see how $\{{}^-\infty\}$ and $\{{}^+\infty\}$ can be dense....?

So does this mean two different functions (classes of functions?) that only share one or both infinite limits?

Thanks much for any guidance!

nate

share|improve this question
    
It seems to me that you're overthinking this. Hint: Try really simple functions first - for example indicator functions. –  kahen Oct 20 '11 at 23:04
    
As you suggested I let $h(x) :=f(x)-g(x)$ and so $h(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 0 & x \in A \subseteq \mathbb{R} \\ c_1 & x \in \mathbb{R}\backslash A \end{array} \right.$ But I don't know how to use the Borel feature of $f$ and $g$, nor the $A$ being dense... –  nate Oct 20 '11 at 23:12
    
You're making it far too difficult on yourself. Why the sudden appearance of $h$?! What the heck is that $c_1$ doing there?! You're still overthinking it. –  kahen Oct 20 '11 at 23:15
    
Well indicator function made me think of $h(x)$ and $c_1$ is just a number. For what you had proposed, $1_A$ and $0$ agree on the set $\{0\} \cup A^c$. As far as too difficult - maybe, but that is because I don't know how to do this I guess. –  nate Oct 20 '11 at 23:24
1  
You might as well take $g(x)$ to be identically $0$. Now take $f$ to be the indicator function of some subset of $\mathbb{R}$ whose complement is dense in $\mathbb{R}$. You have to choose the subset so as to get $f(x)\ne 0$ almost everywhere, but there’s an easy example that does just that. –  Brian M. Scott Oct 20 '11 at 23:28

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Thanks all for the help with this - it may yet need editing? @Gerry ?

So set $g(x)=0$ identically and treat $f(x)$ as an indicator/characteristic function on the set where $f(x) \neq g(x)$. The dense subset of $\mathbb{R}$ where the two functions are equal has the properties, $$f(x) = g(x) \longleftrightarrow \lambda^{\ast}(\left\{ x \in \mathbb{R} : f(x) = g(x) \right\} ) = \lambda^{\ast}\big(H^c:= dense\;\;subset\;\;of\;\;\mathbb{R} \big) = 0,$$ and the function is defined as, $$f(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 1,& x \in H \subseteq \mathbb{R} \\ 0, & x \notin H \end{array} \right. .$$ So choose $H$ s.t. $f(x) \neq 0\;\;a.e.$.

Let $H:=\mathbb{R}\backslash \mathbb{Q} \Longleftrightarrow H^c = \mathbb{Q}$, where $\mathbb{Q}$ is dense (and countable). Then the indicator function becomes, $$f(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 1, & x \in \mathbb{R}\backslash \mathbb{Q} \\ 0, & x \in \mathbb{Q} \end{array} \right. .$$ As a check then, on $\mathbb{Q}$, $f(x) = 0$ and $g(x) = 0$ (though $g(x) = 0$, being identically 0 implies it is the additive identity of the underlying group, and $f(x)=0$ implies that $\left[f(x)\right] = 0$ as a class of functions - are they really the same?).

On $\mathbb{R} \backslash \mathbb{Q}$, $f(x) = 1$ and $g(x) = 0$.

share|improve this answer
    
Looks OK to me. –  Gerry Myerson Oct 21 '11 at 22:53

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.