Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is an idea I have had in my head for years and years and I would like to know the answer, and also I would like to know if it's somehow relevant to anything or useless. I describe my thoughts with the following image:
enter image description here
What would the area of the "red almost half circle" on top of the third square be, assuming you rotate the hypotenuse of a square around it's center limiting its movement so it cannot pass through the bottom of the square.
My guess would be:

$$\ \frac{\left(\pi*(h/2)^2 - a^2\right)}{2}$$

And also, does this have any meaning? Have I been wandering around thinking about complete nonsense for so many years?

share|improve this question
2  
I would almost guess that this problem has something to do with so-called catenary problem (hanging chain) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catenary. It looks related to me. –  pisoir Apr 6 at 16:42
1  
I don't think the shape at the top of the curve is actually a circle. I can write out the details of this as an answer if people are interested. –  Nate Eldredge Apr 6 at 17:08
    
Superficially, it might also be related to the Kakeya problem? –  neuguy Apr 6 at 17:11
2  
@kigen: It's clearly not a circle centered at the green point. It's less clear (to me) that it can't be a circle centered at some other point. –  Nate Eldredge Apr 6 at 17:19
2  
Perhaps you would enjoy an introductory text on synthetic geometry. You see constructions with this type of constraint a lot there, and calculus often isn't necessary. –  Loki Clock Apr 7 at 9:07

6 Answers 6

up vote 56 down vote accepted

Let $O$ be the center of the square, and let $\ell(\theta)$ be the line through $O$ that makes an angle $\theta$ with the horizontal line. The line $\ell(\theta)$ intersects with the lower side of the square at a point $M_\theta$, with $OM_\theta=\dfrac{a}{2\sin \theta }$. So, if $N_\theta$ is the other end of our 'rotating' diagonal then we have $$ON_\theta=\rho(\theta)=h-OM_\theta=a\sqrt{2}-\dfrac{a}{2\sin \theta }.$$ Now, the area traced by $ON_\theta$ as $\theta$ varies between $\pi/4$ and $3\pi/4$ is our desired area augmented by the area of the quarter of the square. So, the desired area is $$\eqalign{ \mathcal{A}&=\frac{1}{2}\int_{\pi/4}^{3\pi/4}\rho^2(\theta)\,d\theta-\frac{a^2}{4}\cr &=a^2\int_{\pi/4}^{\pi/2}\left(\sqrt{2}-\frac{1}{2\sin\theta}\right)^2\,d\theta-\frac{a^2}{4} &=a^2\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\sqrt{2}\ln(1+\sqrt{2})\right) } $$ Therefore, the correct answer is about $13.6\%$ larger than the conjectured answer.

share|improve this answer

(Misinterpreted question, working on the correct version), the second part still holds.

The other question:

Does this have any meaning? Have I been wandering around thinking about complete nonsense for so many years?

I am not sure what you mean, to me all math is meaningful. There is no such thing as meaningless in math, unless you write something obviously absurd like

$$\frac{1}{8}- \text{tomato} = ??$$

Now, yours is certainly a valid question, with some applications in engineering, I presume. Sure the above calculation isn't ground breaking -- fairly elementary in fact -- but it could come up.

Also, I do see some hints and traces of the Isoperimetric problem which discusses how efficient a shape is at enclosing an area, and circles happen to be the most efficient, a property that translates into volume-area efficiency in spheres -- which is the reason behind why all major celestial bodies are (almost) spheres, why bubbles are spherical, why raindrops are spherical, et cetera.

share|improve this answer
    
It won't be a circle. At the vertices, the distance from the centre of the square is $\frac{a}{\sqrt{2}}$, in the middle of each arc, the distance is $(\sqrt{2}-\frac{1}{2})a$. –  Daniel Fischer Apr 6 at 16:23
    
@DanielFischer he isn't rotating it about the centre? –  Sabyasachi Apr 6 at 16:26
14  
I object to the example. $\frac{1}{8}-\text{tomato}$ makes sense in any additive abelian group containing $\frac{1}{8}$ and a tomato. –  neuguy Apr 6 at 17:10
1  
@user73985 why do we insist on $\text{tomato}$ making sense, when in fact that was clearly not the point of the answer. –  Sabyasachi Apr 7 at 15:31
1  
@corsiKa such philosophy. many touching. wow. –  Sabyasachi Apr 9 at 16:06

math stuff?

I'm not like super expert at math, and I only kind of checked my work, but I'm pretty sure this crudely-drawn msPaint picture is correct.

share|improve this answer
4  
I'm gonna be honest, the fact that you thought this was posting after all the other awesome answers (and with that ridiculous disclaimer, no less!) is hilarious. I mean, kudos on getting an answer that agrees with Omran Kouba's, but...really? –  Kyle Strand Apr 7 at 18:45

I found this problem interesting enough to make a little animation along the line of @Blue's diagram (but I didn't want to edit their answer without permission):

enter image description here

Mathematica syntax for those who are interested:

G[d_, t_] := {t - (d t)/Sqrt[1 + t^2], d /Sqrt[1 + t^2]}
P[c_, m_] := Show[ParametricPlot[G[# Sqrt[8], t], {t, -4, 4}, 
 PlotStyle -> {Dashed, Hue[#]}, PlotRange -> {{-1.025, 1.025}, {-.025, 
               2 Sqrt[2] + 0.025}}] & /@ (Range[m]/m), 
 ParametricPlot[G[Sqrt[8], t], {t, -1, 1}, PlotStyle -> {Red, Thick}], 
 Graphics[{Black, Disk[{0, 1}, .025], Opacity[0.1], Rectangle[{-1, 0}, {1, 2}],
           Opacity[1], Line[{{c, 0}, G[Sqrt[8], c]}], Disk[{c, 0}, .025],
           {Hue[#], Disk[G[# Sqrt[8], c], .025]} & /@ (Range[m]/m)}],
 Axes -> False]
Manipulate[P[c, m], {c, -1, 1}, {m, 1, 20, 1}]
share|improve this answer
2  
Very nice! I'd certainly let you add it to my answer, but I'd prefer it stand alone so that you can get up-votes. –  Blue Apr 7 at 2:53
5  
ooooh shiny. +1 –  Sabyasachi Apr 7 at 5:13
    
That's beautiful! +1 –  Pontus Magnusson Apr 7 at 16:38
    
We can also forget about the square, and then let this segment rotate even further, its "foot" running along the $x$-axis and its direction such that it always points to the "focus" $(0,b)$ (notation from Blues answer). I wonder if the curve has a name. –  Jeppe Stig Nielsen Apr 8 at 15:22

To avoid some fractions, I'll define $b := a/2$, so that the side of the square is $2b$ and its diagonal has length $2b\sqrt{2}$. Position the square so that its bottom lies on the $x$-axis, and its center lies on the $y$ axis (specifically, at $(0,b)$).

A tilted diagonal determines a line through $(0,b)$ and, say, $(c,0)$, with $c$ some parameter such that $-b \leq c \leq b$. Such a line has equation $$\frac{x}{c} + \frac{y}{b} = 1 \qquad \to \qquad x b + y c = b c \qquad (\star)$$ The upper endpoint, $(x,y)$, of the tilted diagonal is a distance $2b\sqrt{2}$ from $(c,0)$: $$(x-c)^2 + y^2 = 8 b^2 \qquad (\star\star)$$ Eliminating $c$ from $(\star)$ and $(\star\star)$ gives $$x^2 = \frac{(y-b)^2 (8 b^2 - y^2)}{y^2}$$ This equation represents this graph:

enter image description here

The area of the portion above the square can be determined via this integral:

$$2\;\int_{2b}^{2b\sqrt{2}}\frac{y-b}{y}\sqrt{8b^2-y^2} \; dy = 2b^2 \left( \pi - 2 \sqrt{2} \log( 1 + \sqrt{2} ) \right) = a^2 \left( \frac{\pi}{2} - \sqrt{2} \log(1+\sqrt{2})\right)$$ which agrees with both @OmranKouba and @IanMateus.

share|improve this answer

This isn't really an answer, but I wanted to record my observation that the curve in question is not actually a circle.

Let's say the square has corners at $(\pm 1, \pm 1)$ so that the center is at the origin (and the diagonal has length $\sqrt{8}$). If we fix a point $(s,-1)$ on the lower edge of the square, the line through $(s,-1)$ and $(0,0)$ is parametrized by $t \mapsto (-ts, t)$. The point on this line which is distance $\sqrt{8}$ from $(s,-1)$ corresponds to $t$ being the positive solution of $$(-ts-s)^2+(t+1)^2=8$$ which is $$t = -1 + \sqrt{\frac{8}{s^2+1}}.$$ So the curve is parametrized by $$(x(s),y(s)) = \left( s - s\sqrt{\frac{8}{s^2+1}}, -1+\sqrt{\frac{8}{s^2+1}}\right).$$ If this is indeed a circle, by symmetry its center must be on the $y$-axis at some point $(0, y_0)$ in which case we must have $$x(s)^2 + (y(s)-y_0)^2 = \text{const}$$ or, differentiating, $$2 x(s) x'(s) + 2 (y(s)-y_0) y'(s) = 0.$$ Solving, we find that we must have $$y_0 = \frac{x(s) x'(s)}{y'(s)} + y(s).$$ But this is not constant. When $s=0$ the right side is $\frac{4-\sqrt{2}}{4}$ while if $s=1$ we get $1$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.