Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This concept appears in Bott&Tu's GTM82. A flat vector bundle is one who has a particular trivialization with locally constant transition functions. Then my question is whether every vector bundle over a manifold admits such a trivialization.

btw: Are the tags correct?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 10 down vote accepted

No. Using the Chern-Weil perspective on characteristic classes (see here), you can prove that all the rational Pontryagin classes of a flat vector bundle have to vanish. Thus all you need are vector bundles with non-vanishing rational Pontryagin classes, of which there are many.

A very nice source for this perspective on characteristic classes and flat bundles is Morita's book "Geometry of characteristic classes".

share|cite|improve this answer
I tried to put a link to wikipedia, but it seems to have been deleted... – Adam Smith Oct 20 '11 at 0:51
Thanks t.b.!!!! – Adam Smith Oct 20 '11 at 0:54
I fixed it. Wikipedia has this habit of using non-standard characters in links, and that is not very well supported by this site. Here it was the dash. Replacing it by the the dash on the keyboard usually works, otherwise you have to resort to percent encoding but that is somewhat painful. – t.b. Oct 20 '11 at 0:56
@Adam Smith a very minor point : there is no "The" in the title of Morita's book. – Olivier Bégassat Oct 20 '11 at 0:58
In particular, the tangent bundle of $S^2$ can't be given a flat structure. – Ryan Budney Oct 20 '11 at 4:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.