Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Any finite sequences can be expressed as a polynomial, but there are many infinite sequences for which we have found no closed form. Is it possible that no closed form exists? Are there sequences in which we've been able to PROVE no closed form exists?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

There are infinite sequences without closed forms, for any reasonable definition of "closed form". There are only countably many closed form expressions and uncountably many sequences.

share|cite|improve this answer
You are faster:) one comment, the right numbers are $2^c$ and $c$, because the coefficients can be real numbers ;) – N. S. Oct 18 '11 at 18:40
So there must exist sequences without closed form, that makes sense. Are there specific sequences that you know of where people have proved that that specific sequence has no closed form? – Dan Oct 18 '11 at 18:45
@Dan: you need to fix a definition of closed form... – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Oct 18 '11 at 18:50
"Closed form" is a very slippery term. As soon as you give a specific example, someone may invent a new named function to give a "closed form" to that example. – Robert Israel Oct 18 '11 at 18:52
Actually, the cardinality of sequences of real numbers is just $c$. Any sequence of real numbers can be encoded in a single real number. If, for simplicity, we assume $0 \le x_n < 1$, let $w$ be the number in $[0,1]$ whose $({n}^{2}+2\,nm+{m}^{2}-3\,n-m+2)/2$'th decimal digit is the $n$'th decimal digit of $x_m$, for all positive integers $m$ and $n$. – Robert Israel Oct 18 '11 at 19:06

As has been noted, no answer can be given until you define "closed form". You might, however, be interested in the sequence of busy beaver numbers, which is known to grow faster than any computable function (and thus can't be given by any computable function). I'm sure some people would happily accept that as an example for which there is, provably, no closed form.

share|cite|improve this answer
I am one of the people you talk about, so I happily accepted this answer. – Ross Millikan Oct 19 '11 at 2:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.