Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

My question is about the end of the proof of theorem 1.1, in page 27.

Namely, it is stated that whenever we have a multiplicative function $f:\mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{C},$ let the sequence $\Lambda_{f}(n)$ be defined via the Dirichlet series $$-\frac{D'_{f}(s)}{D_{f}(s)}=\sum_{1}^{\infty}\Lambda_{f}(n)n^{-s}$$ where $D_{f}=\sum_{1}^{\infty} f(n) n^{-s}$ is the Dirichlet series of $f(n).$ Now let's suppose that $$\sum_{n\leq x}\Lambda_{f}(n)=k \log{x}+O(1) $$ for some constant $k>-\frac{1}{2}$ and that $$\sum_{n \leq x}|f(n)| \ll (\log x)^{|k|}$$

The fact that I am not able to justify is that under these assumptions the following infinite product $$ \prod_{p}(1-p^{-s-1})^{k}\left(\sum_{\nu=0}^{\infty}f(p^{\nu})p^{-\nu s}\right)$$ has the following limit as $s \to 0$ from the right $$\prod_{p}(1-p^{-1})^{k}\left(\sum_{\nu=0}^{\infty}f(p^{\nu})\right) $$

Any suggestions on that ?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Notice that $\prod_{p\leq\\z}(1-p^{-1})^{k}\left(\sum_{\nu=0}^{\\r}f(p^{\nu})\right) \leq O((\log z)^{-k})\left(\sum_{n\leq\\x}f(n)\right)$, where $\\n\leq\ x$ is chosen accordingly to $\\z\geq\ p$. So, letting $\\x,z\to \infty$ we note that the product is convergent. Now, $\prod_{p}(1-p^{-s-1})^{k}\left(\sum_{\nu=0}^{\infty}f(p^{\nu})p^{-\nu s}\right) = D_f(s)/(\zeta(s+1))^k$ which is absolutely 'okay' for $\\Re(s)>0$, also $D_f(s)/(\zeta(s+1))^k$ is analytic at $s=0$ by checking limit (having no pole there) . Hence, by well known facts from complex analysis letting $\\s\to\ 0+$ we get the result.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.