Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I typically like to practice my knowledge on a specific concept by doing proofs using one definition of a term, and then doing the same proofs using an equivalent definition (without inducing the equivalence). However, I'm stuck on the following:

We say that a topological space $(S,T)$ is perfectly normal if for every closed set $F\subseteq S$ there is a continuous function $f:S\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ with $F=\{x\in S:f(x)=0\}$.

Can we prove that a metric space is perfectly normal by this definition?



I've seen some posts (post 1, post 2) where this just follows as a corollary. More specifically, it follows by the equivalence of definitions and the results that metric spaces are normal and $G_\delta$. However, I'm wondering if there was a more direct approach, as opposed to such a roundabout method?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 9 down vote accepted

For all nonempty $A \subset X$ the function “least distance to $A$” given by $$x \mapsto \operatorname{dist}{(x,A)} = \inf\limits_{a \in A}\;d(x,a)$$ is continuous (even $1$-Lipschitz) and it is zero precisely on the closure of $A$, see this thread for some proofs of that fact.

If $A \neq \emptyset$ is closed then $A = \{x \in X\,:\,\operatorname{dist}(x,A) = 0\}$. If $A = \emptyset$ take a constant non-zero function.

share|improve this answer
    
Great construction! I hadn't even considered doing a constructive proof since I thought it would be too hard. I was merely hoping that out of the definitions, I could somehow "pop out" the subtle existence of one. But this is much better! –  Dustin Tran Oct 18 '11 at 10:05

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.