Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Considering the $\textit{Divisor Summatory Function}$, $D(n)$, defined as $$ D(n) = \sum_{k=1}^{n}d(k) , $$ where $$ d(n) = \sum_{k|n}^{n}1. $$

One can observe the following pattern in the values of $D(n)$ $$ \lbrace D(n) \rbrace = \left\lbrace \overbrace{\underbrace{0}_{\text{even}}}^{1},\overbrace{ \underbrace{1,3,5}_{\text{odd}}}^{3},\overbrace{\underbrace{8,10,14,16,20}_{\text{even}}}^{5},\overbrace{\underbrace{23,27,29,35,37,41,45}_{\text{odd}}}^{7}, \cdots \right\rbrace, $$ where groups of odd elements alternate with groups of even elements and where the $n^{th}$ group has $2n-1$ elements, (we can see that the pattern pesists). Now, based on this (but it is not necessary that this pattern of $D(n)$ is verified for all $n$ we can only assume that such a similar pattern exists), and considering that any number can be written as $$ \begin{align*} n=p_{1}^{\alpha_{1}}\cdot p_{2}^{\alpha_{2}}\cdot p_{3}^{\alpha_{3}} \cdots p_{n}^{\alpha_{n}} \end{align*} $$ where $p_{i}$ are prime numbers, one can define some arithmetical functions as follows $$ a(n)= \begin{cases} 1, & \text{if all } D(\alpha_1), D(\alpha_2), \ldots, D(\alpha_n) \text{ are even} ,\\ \\ \\ 0, & \text{if one or more of the } D(\alpha_{i}) \text{ is odd}, \end{cases} $$ and $$ b(n)= \begin{cases} (-1)^{n_1+n_2+\cdots+n_i}, &\text{if } \alpha_i = n_i^2, \\ 0, & \text{if } \alpha_i \text{ is not of the form } n_i^2, \end{cases} $$ ($b(n)=$A197774) then we can define two Dirichlet series $A(s)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{a(k)}{n^{s}}$ with $a(1)=1$ and $B(s)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{b(k)}{n^{s}}$ with $b(1)=1$.

Both of the Dirichlet series have, respectively, the following Euler's products $$ \begin{align*} A(s) &= \prod_{p\in \mathbb{P}}\left(1+\frac{1}{p^{4s}}+\cdots+\frac{1}{p^{8s}}+\frac{1}{p^{16s}}+\cdots+\frac{1}{p^{24s}}+\cdots\right)\\ &=\prod_{p\in\mathbb{P}}\left(1+\frac{1}{p^{4s}}\left(1+\frac{1}{p^{s}}+\cdots+\frac{1}{p^{4s}}\right) +\frac{1}{p^{16s}}\left(1+\frac{1}{p^{s}}+\cdots+\frac{1}{p^{8s}}\right) +\cdots\right)\\ &=\prod_{p\in\mathbb{P}}\left(1+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{p^{(2k)^{2}s}}\left(1+\frac{1}{p^{s}}+\cdots+\frac{1}{p^{4ks}}\right)\right)\\ \end{align*} $$ and $$ B(s) = \prod_{p\in \mathbb{P}}\left(1 - \frac{1}{p^{s}}+\frac{1}{p^{4s}}-\frac{1}{p^{9s}}+\frac{1}{p^{16s}}-\frac{1}{p^{25s}}+\frac{1}{p^{36s}}-\cdots\right) $$ First we can see that $A(s)$ is absolutely convergent for $s>\frac{1}{4}$. Secondly we can observe that $B(s)$ is related to $\vartheta_{4}(0,x)=1-x+x^{4}-x^{9}+x^{16}\cdots$ (the Jacobi Theta function) by $$ \begin{equation*} B(s) = \prod_{p\in \mathbb{P}}\left(\frac{1}{2} \vartheta_{4}(0,p^{-s})+1 \right) \end{equation*} $$ and thirdly $$ \begin{equation*} \zeta(s) = \frac{A(s)}{B(s)} \end{equation*} $$ We can think of $b(n)$ as a generalization of $\mu(n)$, the Möbius function and we can assume that if $B(s)$ converges for $\Re{s}>\frac{1}{2}$ then $\zeta(s)$ has no zeros on the right of $\frac{1}{2}$, just like the Mertens function, where $$ \begin{equation*} \frac{1}{\zeta(s)} = s\int_{1}^{\infty}\frac{M(x)}{x^{s+1}}dx \end{equation*} $$ similarly for $\zeta(s)$ we have $$ \begin{equation*} \zeta(s) = \frac{A(s)}{ s\int_{1}^{\infty}\frac{B(x)}{x^{s+1}}dx} \end{equation*} $$ where $M(x)$ is the Mertens function $$ \begin{equation*} M(x)=\sum_{1\leq n \leq x}\mu(x) \end{equation*} $$ and $B(x)$ is $$ \begin{equation*} B(x)=\sum_{1 \leq n \leq x}b(x) \end{equation*} $$ My question is: Were these Dirichlet series, $A(s)$ and $B(s)$, studied before and related to the $\zeta(s)$-function the way I did? Or... is this something new?

Thanks.

share|improve this question
    
I'm curious how/where you got these things... –  anon Oct 18 '11 at 11:02
    
@anon, it all started with this sequence $0,1,0,2,0,1,0,3,\cdots$ –  Neves Oct 18 '11 at 11:44

2 Answers 2

up vote 4 down vote accepted

See my response here.

share|improve this answer

Your original observation is easily explained: $d(n)$ is odd if and only if $n$ is a square.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.