Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This thought occurred to me earlier and I'm surprised I hadn't considered it previously. I get the feeling that no meaningful generalization can occur in a non-separable Banach space but on the surface it seems like a meaningful generalization can be had if the Banach space is separable. Even if it's possible, convergence and other issues likely severely complicate the matter.

share|improve this question
2  
Just thinking off the top of my head, it seems to me there are at least two sources of headache here: 1) Unless you're working with Hilbert spaces, you need to pick some flavour of Banach space tensor product. 2) Once you've chosen your favourite Banach space tensor product, you need to decide whether $k$-forms live in $\wedge^k B^\ast$ or, more generally, in $(\wedge^k B)^\ast$. –  Branimir Ćaćić Mar 30 at 23:36
    
Yeah that's a good point. I guess Hilbert spaces are the most natural setting anyway. –  Cameron Williams Mar 30 at 23:44

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Yes, it is possible. For example, Serge Lang exhibits the basics of a theory of differential forms on Banach manifolds in Chapter V of his Differential and Riemannian Manifolds. (Non-)Separability is not an issue.

According to Lang, a $p$-form on a Banach space $E$ is simply a continuous alternating $p$-linear map on $E$. This yields a notion of $p$-forms on any Banach manifold and Lang shows how to define exterior and Lie derivative and derives their fundamental algebraic properties in this context.

share|improve this answer
    
Neat! Thanks for the reference. I'll check it out. –  Cameron Williams Jul 1 at 14:39

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.