Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I find this in my Set theory material:

[0] = {x:0==x(mod2)} = {x:2|0-x}

, where I'm replacing equivalence sign ("=" with extra horizontal line) with double equality sign "==" because I don't know how to input the proper symbol.

I'm reading it as

class 0 includes (all x that are defined by 0 being equivalent to x%2) which is equal to (all x that are defined by 2 being such that 0-x)

I am confused about this part:


Shouldn't there be be a boolean statement to the right of "|"? Or am I misreading?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

$|$ in this case means 'divides':

share|cite|improve this answer
isn't there a problem with dividing by 0? or does | have lower priority than - in this context for some reason? EDIT: oh. divides, not divided by. never mind this comment. – user3324865 Mar 27 '14 at 8:54

The usual convention for defining a class is this $$\Bigl\{\textbf{variable }\Large\text{separator }\normalsize\textbf{condition on the variable}\Bigr\}$$

The separator can be $:$ (colon) or it can be $\mid$ (pipe). In this case, the symbol $\mid$ is already used to denote the divisibility relation, therefore $:$ was used.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.