Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is generic approach to solving this system?

$$ \rho\left({\partial v_i \over\partial t}+v_k{\partial v_i \over \partial x_k} \right) = - {\partial p \over\partial x_i} + {\partial \over\partial x_k}\left\{ \mu \left({\partial v_i \over\partial x_k}+{\partial v_k \over\partial x_i} - {2\over 3}\delta_{i,k}{\partial v_l \over\partial x_l}\right) \right\}+{\partial \over\partial x_k}\left( \zeta {\partial v_l \over\partial x_l}\delta_{i,k}\right) $$

$$\vec{v}|_{\partial \Omega} = 0, \quad \vec{v}|_{t=0} = \vec{v}_{0}$$

I finished a course in differential math and PDE, but I can't even say what is the kind of the task.

The task is to be solved numerically.

PS: or can anybody say something about last two formulas? What is "\partial \Omega" ($\partial \Omega$) usually means?

share|improve this question
9  
I don't suppose "run away screaming" qualifies as a generic approach? :) –  Zarrax Oct 13 '11 at 17:28
3  
$\partial \Omega$ is the boundary of $\Omega$. –  Beni Bogosel Oct 16 '11 at 8:25
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 0 down vote accepted

This is the Navier–Stokes for compressible fluid exactly as was recorded here http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%8C%D0%B5_%E2%80%94_%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B0

and the second formula seems to be "No Slip Condition", e.g. here http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/NoSlipCondition.html for non-movable container. and the '\partial \omega' sounds as ... walls of the container. So, fluid at the points, just next to the walls is stopped and notmovable.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.