Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

True or False?

If $\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_{n}^2$ is convergent, and$\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (\frac{\pi}{2} - b_{n})$ is divergent, then $\displaystyle {a_{n}(\sin(b_{n})-1)}$ is a convergent sequence.

So we know that $(a_{n})^2$ is convergent. Therefore, $\lim_{n \to \infty} a_{n}^2 = 0$ I'm not sure what this tells us about or how to relate this to $(a_{n})$.

Also, we can see that since $-1 \ge \sin(b_{n}) \le 1$ And therefore, $-2 \ge \sin(b_{n}) - 1 \le 0$

However, again since I don't know what I can conclude about $(a_{n})$, I'm not sure how I can use this fact.

share|cite|improve this question
I am sure there is a better title available... :P – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Oct 19 '10 at 21:40
OK, I'll delete my comments too. If you're sure this is the actual question, I don't need to comment anyway. :) – Jonas Meyer Oct 19 '10 at 22:10
up vote 3 down vote accepted

In the current form of the question, the condition on $b_n$ is irrelevant.

As you said, $a_n^2\to0$. This implies that $a_n\to0$. Then because $|a_n(\sin(b_n)-1)|=|a_n||\sin(b_n)-1|$ and, for the reason you indicated, $|\sin(b_n)-1|\leq2$ for all $n$, the $n^{th}$ term in the sequence has absolute value less than or equal to $2|a_n|$, which converges to 0.

share|cite|improve this answer
Why are you taking the absolute value of $|a_n(\sin(b_n)-1)|$? Also, how do we know that something smaller than $2|a_n|$ converges to 0? – fdart17 Oct 20 '10 at 1:07
@Justin: The answer to the first question is that I want to show that the sequence converges to 0, and this is equivalent to showing that the sequence of absolute values goes to zero. (In general a sequence {x_n} converge to L if |x_n - L| converges to 0, and here L=0.). – Jonas Meyer Oct 20 '10 at 1:30
@Justin: An answer to the second question is given by an analogue of the "squeeze theorem" for sequences: The sequence is "squeezed" between -2|a_n| and 2|a_n|, which both go to zero. It's basically because we can make 2|a_n| as small as we want by taking n big enough, and so if we have a sequence {x_n} with |x_n| smaller than 2|a_n|, then we can also make |x_n| as small as we want by taking n big enough. – Jonas Meyer Oct 20 '10 at 1:35
@Justin: Incidentally, you didn't have to accept the answer if it wasn't clear :) – Jonas Meyer Oct 20 '10 at 1:36
I tried to undo it but it was not working, something about having accepted it too recently :) Thanks a lot. – fdart17 Oct 20 '10 at 1:43

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.