Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Where is the error in the following statement: $i^2=(i^2)^{\frac{4}{4}}=(i^4)^{\frac{2}{4}}=(1)^{\frac{1}{2}}=1$?

I feel the error is in the first equality, because $(i^2)^{\frac{4}{4}}$ is in fact $((i^2)^4)^{\frac{1}{4}}$ which is 1, but what is the mathematical reason so that raising a number to the $4/4$th power is not necessarily the number itself? Is it because the fourth root of a fourth power of a number $x$, may be either $x$ or $-x$, depending upon which is positive? I think I need a rigorous explanation.

Thanks for your time.

share|cite|improve this question
Note, you aren't really using $i$, you could just as well write this as: $(-1)^{\frac{2}{2}} = ((-1)^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}$ – Thomas Andrews Oct 12 '11 at 13:14
possible duplicate of -1 is not 1, so where is the mistake? – J. M. Nov 27 '11 at 2:22
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Ok, so rigorous explanation should be given in terms of complex analysis. But first consider even the simpler example: $-1 = (-1)^1=(-1)^{2/2} = \left((-1)^2\right)^{1/2} = 1^{1/2}=1$.

The trick is coming when you're take non-integer power of negative number or of complex one with a non-zero imaginary part. The reason is that you define $y=x^{1/m}$ as $$ y = \{z:z^m = x\} $$ and an equation $z^m=x$ has $m$ different roots. That's why when you're writing $a = a^{4/4}$ you implicitly take the forth root and so the answer is not uniquely defined. To be precise, you should think of it as $a\in a^{4/4}$ since ther right-hand side is not a unique element.

share|cite|improve this answer

$(1)^{\frac{1}{2}}$=1 or -1

So in general the square root gives two answers. + and -. Since essentially $x^2-1=0$ has two solutions x=1 and x=-1. So that is why your reasoning is flawed.

A very similar flawed argument like that is raising $(e^{i\theta})^i$ and assuming the usual power rules apply to it.

In general this is a big problem with complex analysis. Square root function, lnx, e^x and other can give many answers if you put complex numbers in them.

share|cite|improve this answer
Nitpicking: the exponential function $e^x$ is well-defined and single-valued over its entire domain; however, it's many-to-one (e.g., $e^{2\pi i} = e^0 = 1$) so its inverse $\ln x$ is (as you note) not single-valued. – Steven Stadnicki Nov 27 '11 at 2:31

Noninteger exponents $x$ in power expressions $a^x$ are allowed only for bases $a>0$. Whenever a complex number not of this form appears as a basis the usual rules of handling powers are no longer valid.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.