Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I have a transition matrix defined as $p_{ij}=1$ for $j=i+1$ and $p_{ij}=0$ otherwise, where the state-space is countably infinite, what would this be? It doesn't look like a communicating class because no 2 states communicate but then the "communication" relation partitions the state-space, hence the entire state-space must be one big communicating class here? Then the whole thing is closed? But that shouldn't be right...

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Correct me if you use the wrong definition of the communication, I base on the book 'Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability'. There $i,j$ communicate iff either $i=j$ or $p^m_{ij}>0$ and $p^n_{ji}>0$ for some $0<m,n<\infty$. In your case any state communicates only with itseld, so you have countably many communicating classes. I.e. in terms of relations, $[i] = i$ for all $i=1,2,3,...$

To be precise, in your question the statement

no 2 states communicate

is incorrect since any state communicate with itself by definition.

share|cite|improve this answer
Ah, thanks! :-) I didn't realize that. – doob Oct 12 '11 at 12:34
You are welcome – Ilya Oct 12 '11 at 13:11

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.