# If a prime can be expressed as sum of square of two integers, then prove that the representation is unique.

If a prime can be expressed as sum of two squares, then prove that the representation is unique.

My attempt:
If $a^2+b^2=p$, then it is obvious that $a,b$ of different parity.
Now, I assume the contraposition that the representation is not unique, $p=a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2$. Again, $c,d$ are of different parity.

Now, let $b,d$ be even and $a,c$ be odd.

So, $a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2 \implies a^2-c^2=d^2-b^2 \implies (a+c)(a-c)=(d-b)(d+b)$.

-
Nitpick corner case: $2 = 1^2 + 1^2$, so not necessarily of different parity. This would most likely be taken care of in a different case. :) – apnorton Mar 20 '14 at 12:02
@anorton That is definitely something I didn't think about...thanks for identification – Hawk Mar 20 '14 at 12:02

The slickest way is via a little Algebraic Number Theory. If $p=a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2$ then $$p=(a+bi)(a-bi)=(c+di)(c-di)$$ Now ${\bf Z}[i]$ is a unique factorization domain, so these two factorizations of $p$ show that $a+bi$ can't be a prime in ${\bf Z}[i]$. We must have a non-trivial factorization $a+bi=(s+ti)(u+vi)$, whence $a-bi=(s-ti)(u-vi)$, and then $$p=(s^2+t^2)(u^2+v^2)$$ contradicting primality of $p$.

There are ways to answer your question without these advanced concepts, but I can never remember how it's done. I'm sure someone else will.

-
Thanks for the approach...I will try to do something with this. – Hawk Mar 20 '14 at 12:00

Here's an answer without Algebraic Number Theory. I found it in Shanks, Solved and Unsolved Problems in Number Theory.

Assume $$p=a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2\tag1$$ with all variables positive integers. Then $$p^2=(a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2)=a^2c^2+a^2d^2+b^2c^2+b^2d^2$$ and you can verify by just multiplying everything out that $$p^2=(ac+bd)^2+(ad-bc)^2\tag2$$ and $$p^2=(ac-bd)^2+(ad+bc)^2\tag3$$ By (1), we have $$(p-a^2)d^2=(p-c^2)b^2$$ which implies $$p(d^2-b^2)=(ad-bc)(ad+bc)\tag4$$ From (4), $p$ divides $ad-bc$, or $p$ divides $ad+bc$. If $p$ divides $ad-bc$, then from (2) we get $ad-bc=0$, so $d^2-b^2=0$, so $b=d$. If $p$ divides $ad+bc$, then from (3) we get $ac=bd$. Now $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime, so $a$ divides $d$, and $b$ divides $c$. Then by (1) we have $a=d$, and we have proved that the two representations of $p$ are the same.

This is probably something like what @Konstantinos was getting at in his answer.

-
Just noting that $(a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2)=(ac+bd)^2+(ad-bc)^2=(ac-bd)^2+(ad+bc)^2$ states that if a number is the product of two sums of squares,then the number can also be written as the sum of two squares.This is the sum of squares identity of Diophantus. – rah4927 Mar 21 '14 at 9:11

If $p=a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2$ then $$p=\frac{(ac+bd)(ac-bd)}{(a+d)(a-d)}$$

-
How is that supposed to help? – Hawk Mar 20 '14 at 17:48
It is a contradiction this shows that $p$ must be composite.Maybe i will edit it later when i will have time! – Konstantinos Gaitanas Mar 20 '14 at 18:01