Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I need to find $f(f(x)) = 4 - 3x$

In other examples, such as $f(2)$, I can see that the result equates to $-2$ or $f(x^2)$ becomes $-3x^2 + 4$.

Do I really just substitute $f(x)$ for $x$ and simplify?

share|cite|improve this question
If I do the substitution I end up with f(x) = 4/3, so the function of the function of x = 4/3. Is this the right direction? – erimar77 Oct 11 '11 at 22:05
What you are asking is not fully clear. But if you are given that $f(x)=4-3x$, and you are asked what is $f(f(x))$, yes, you substitute. So $f(f(x))=4-3(4-3x)$. Simplify. – André Nicolas Oct 11 '11 at 22:09
Please note that in your title $f(x)=4-3x$, and in the text you write $f(f(x))=4-3x$. I am guessing that you mean "I need to find $f(f(x))$ if $f(x)=4-3x$." But that is not what you actually wrote. – André Nicolas Oct 11 '11 at 22:16
As André Nicolas said, yes you substitute $f(x)$ for $x$ and simplify, but make sure you do it on both sides of the $=$ sign. – Ross Millikan Oct 11 '11 at 22:28
(+1), to compensate for an anonymous downvote, and because this poor guy is actually demonstrating his thought process and explaining where he is stuck... – The Chaz 2.0 Oct 11 '11 at 22:35
up vote 5 down vote accepted

1) There are many solutions to $f(f(x))=4-3x$, if that is your question. Note $f(f(1))=1$.

Here is one using complex numbers: $$f(x)=1+i(x-1)\sqrt{3}$$ where $i$ is $\sqrt{-1}$.

Here is another in real numbers: $$f(x)=1+(-1)^{\lfloor 2\log_3(|x-1|) \rfloor}(x-1)\sqrt{3}$$ and with the special case of $f(1)=1$.

2) Perhaps your question is simpler than this and you are starting with $f(x)=4-3x$ and you want to know what $f(f(x))$ is. Then yes, you do the substitution and get $$f(f(x))=4-3f(x) = 4-3(4-3x)=4-12+9x = 9x-8$$ as Unreasonable Sin said before deleting that answer.

share|cite|improve this answer
I think just giving the results is quite boring, of course we can verify that they are correct by putting it in but how did you get there? – Listing Oct 11 '11 at 22:39
@Listing: $4-3x$ is in effect a stretch by a magnitude of $3$ and a reversal of sign about $1$ ($0$ would be simpler to deal with so subtract 1 at the start and add it back at the end). So in a sense to get halfway there, you need to stretch by a magnitude of $\sqrt{3}$ and either half reverse the sign on all numbers (multiply by $i$) or reverse the sign for half the numbers (sometimes multiply by $-1$). – Henry Oct 11 '11 at 22:50

Here is @Henry's solution, slightly rephrased, to find a square root of every affine function.

First the trivial case: for every $a\geqslant0$, a square root of $x\mapsto ax+b$ is $x\mapsto\sqrt{a}x+b/(1+\sqrt{a})$. Obviously this trick fails for $x\mapsto -ax+b$ with $a$ positive, which has no affine function as a square root. A solution is to partition the real line into a countable number of intervals and to consider a function $f$ cleverly subordinated to this partition and affine on each of these intervals. Hence $f$ will be far from being affine globally (and not even continuous) but $f\circ f$ will be, miraculously.

Consider a point $x_0$ and two doubly infinite strictly increasing sequences $(a_n)_{n\in\mathbb Z}$ and $(b_n)_{n\in\mathbb Z}$ such that $a_n\to+\infty$ and $b_n\to+\infty$ when $n\to+\infty$, and $a_n\to x_0$ and $b_n\to x_0$ when $n\to-\infty$. Define some intervals $A_n$ and $B_n$ by $A_n=[a_n,a_{n+1}[$ and $B_n=]-b_{n+1},-b_n]$. Hence every $A_n$ is on the right of $x_0$ and every $B_i$ is on the left of $x_0$, the intervals $A_n$ partition $(x_0,+\infty)$ and the intervals $B_i$ partition $(-\infty,x_0)$. Furthermore, every continuous bijection between $A_n$ and $B_i$ is a decreasing function which sends $a_n$ on $-b_i$ and has limit $-b_{i+1}$ at $a_{n+1}$.

Consider an integer $k$ and a function $f$ such that $f(x_0)=x_0$. Assume that:

For every integer $n$, $f$ sends continuously and bijectively $A_{2n}$ on $A_{2n+1+2k}$, $B_{2n}$ on $B_{2n+1+2k}$, $A_{2n+1}$ on $B_{2n}$ and $B_{2n+1}$ on $A_{2n}$.

Then $f\circ f$ is such that $f\circ f(x_0)=x_0$ and $f\circ f$ sends, for every integer $n$, $A_n$ on $B_{n+2k}$ and $B_n$ on $A_{n+2k}$. If the restrictions of $f$ to each $A_n$ and $B_n$ are affine, the function $f\circ f$ is affine on each $A_n$ and $B_n$ as well.

Choose finally $c>1$ and define $a_n=b_n=x_0+c^n$ for every $n$. Then $f\circ f$ sends each $x_0\pm c^n$ on $x_0\mp c^{2k}c^n$ hence $f\circ f(x_0+x)=x_0-c^{2k}x$ for every real number $x$. In other words, $f\circ f$ is the function $x\mapsto-c^{2k}x+(1+c^{2k})x_0$.

This yields a square root of $x\mapsto-ax+b$ for every positive $a\ne1$ (choose $x_0=b/(1+a)$, any $k\ne0$ and solve $c^{2k}=a$) and for $a=1$ (choose any $c>1$, $k=0$ and $x_0=b/2$).

share|cite|improve this answer

Assume a rowvector $\small V(x) = [1,x] $ which you understand as symbolical or as containing a concrete value in x.

Then consider a matrix G, which contains the coefficients of $\small g(x)= f(f(x)) = 4 - 3x $ as $\small G= \left[ \begin{smallmatrix} 1 & 4 \\ 0 & -3 \end{smallmatrix} \right] $ . With this we have $\small V(x) \cdot G = V(g(x)) $ and $\small V(x) \cdot G^h = V(g^{\circ h}(x)) $ where the $\small \circ h $ means h'fold iteration.

Now $\small g(x) = f^{\circ 2} (x) $ so $\small f(x) = g^{\circ 1/2} (x) $ and you need the squareroot of G:

$\qquad \small V(x) \cdot G^{1/2} = V(g^{\circ 1/2}(x)) = V(f(x)) $

Since $\small G (= F ^2) $ is a 2 x 2 matrix only and the first column of F is again [1,0] the solution of $\small F\cdot F = G $ or explicitely

$\qquad \small \left[ \begin{smallmatrix} 1 & a \\ 0 & b \end{smallmatrix} \right] \cdot \left[ \begin{smallmatrix} 1 & a \\ 0 & b \end{smallmatrix} \right] = \left[ \begin{smallmatrix} 1 & 4 \\ 0 & -3 \end{smallmatrix} \right]$

is simply the solution of two equations where one has a quadratic expression (with a complex solution here).

(For the generalization of that concept see for instance Carlemanmatrix in wikipedia)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.