Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $x$ and $p$ be real numbers with $x \ge 1$ and $p \ge 2$ . Show that $(x - 1)(x + 1)^{p - 1} \ge x^p - 1$ .

I recently discovered this result. I am sure it is known, but it is new to me. It is quite easy to prove if $p$ is an integer, even a negative one. I have a proof in the general case above, but it seems overly complicated. Can someone provide a simple demonstration?

share|cite|improve this question
Since $x \geq 1$, you can divide out $x-1$ from both sides of the inequality... – J. M. Oct 11 '11 at 17:14
Sure, but, what do you get when you divide, say, $x^{\pi}-1$ by $x-1$? – Gerry Myerson Oct 11 '11 at 22:12
Somehow I skipped the "$p$ is real" bit... :D – J. M. Oct 20 '11 at 0:46
up vote 5 down vote accepted

[Copied from my answer to the same question on mathoverflow, where "Cardinal" noted the question's previous appearance here]

We prove strict inequality for $x>1$ and $p>2$. Add $1$ to both sides and divide by $x^p$ to get an equivalent inequality that can be written as $$ \frac{x-1}{x} \left(\frac{x+1}{x}\right)^{p-1} + \frac1x \left( \frac1x \right)^{p-1} \geq 1. $$ Since $p > 2$ the function $f : X \mapsto X^{p-1}$ is strictly convex upwards. The left-hand side is a weighted average $$ \frac{x-1}{x} f\left(\frac{x+1}{x}\right) + \frac1x f\left( \frac1x \right) $$ of values of $f$, with positive weights and evaluated at different $X$'s. Hence by Jensen's inequality it strictly exceeds the value of $f$ at the corresponding weighted average of $X$'s, which is $$ f\left(\frac{x-1}{x} \cdot \frac{x+1}{x} + \frac1x \cdot \frac1x \right) = f(1) = 1, $$ QED.

The same argument shows that the inequality holds for $p<1$, and is reversed for $1 < p < 2$ because then $f$ is concave downwards.

share|cite|improve this answer
Nice answer. Perhaps I am missing something a little subtle, but it seems you don't need to appeal to Jensen's inequality here. The definition of strict convexity would seem to suffice. – cardinal Oct 20 '11 at 14:04
Beautiful argument--thanks. I agree with cardinal that convexity is all that is required, not Jensen. – Richard Hevener Oct 20 '11 at 19:01
You're welcome, and thanks for the check-mark. Re convexity vs. Jensen -- they're equivalent, and I learned the inequality some decades ago as "Jensen's inequality"; perhaps by now it's been assimilated thoroughly enough to be regarded as the definition of convexity? – Noam D. Elkies Oct 20 '11 at 20:44
Thanks for your follow-up comment. Out of curiosity, what were you taking as the definition of strict convexity? – cardinal Oct 21 '11 at 2:16
Since $f$ is twice differentiable it's certainly enough that $f''$ is strictly positive. In general it's enough for $f''$ not to vanish on an interval of positive length. For a continuous function that need not be differentiable, it can be convenient to use the definition $f((x+y)/2) < (f(x) + f(y))/2$ for $x \neq y$ (e.g. to prove that a positive power series is logarithmically convex). – Noam D. Elkies Oct 21 '11 at 5:32

Let $f(x) = (x-1)(x+1)^{p-1} - x^p + 1$ and note that $f(1) = 0$.

Now, $$ f'(x) = (p-1)(x-1)(x+1)^{p-2} + (x+1)^{p-1} - p x^{p-1} \>, $$ and rewriting the last two terms, we get $$ f'(x) = (p-1)(x-1)(x+1)^{p-2} + x^{p-1}\left(\left(1+\frac{1}{x}\right)^{p-1} - p\right) \> . $$

By Bernoulli's inequality, $$ \left(1+\frac{1}{x}\right)^{p-1} - p \geq 1+(p-1)/x - p = -x^{-1}(p-1)(x-1). $$

Hence, $$ f'(x) \geq (p-1)(x-1)((x+1)^{p-2} - x^{p-2}) \geq 0 \>, $$ and so $f(x)$ is nondecreasing for $x \geq 1$, which yields the desired result.

share|cite|improve this answer
Fine argument--thanks. – Richard Hevener Oct 20 '11 at 19:02

When $x=1$, it is trivial. Otherwise, it is equivalent to showing $(x + 1)^{p - 1} \ge x^{p-1}+x^{p-2}+\cdots+1$. The binomial expansion of the left hand side .....

Editted In case $p$ is not integer, you'd better prove $f(x)=(x - 1)(x + 1)^{p - 1}- x^p +1$ is nonnegative, this is not difficult.

share|cite|improve this answer
The right side is correct only for integer values of $p$. – robjohn Oct 11 '11 at 18:55
The above proof is valid for positive integers. As I indicated in the statement of the problem, there is no difficulty in the integer case. – Richard Hevener Oct 11 '11 at 22:21
I'm still waiting for the proof in case p is a real number > 2. – Richard Hevener Oct 13 '11 at 15:10

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.