Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $V$ and $W$ be absolutely irreducible quasi-projective varieties over $K$ with char $K=0$ with dim $V=$ dim $W$ and let $f: W \rightarrow V $ be a dominant morphism. Why is it possible to make $f$ into an étale covering by restricting $V$ ?
I know that this is probably a very basic and silly question but I have only started reading about algebraic geometry.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Generically, the map is etale. That is, there exists a nonempty open set $U \subset V$ such that $f^{-1}(U) \to U$ is finite and etale. Indeed, we can assume $f$ is flat at the outset by the generic flatness theorem. Then this follows because if $\xi$ is the generic point of $V$, $f^{-1}(\xi) \to \xi$ is a finite etale morphism (it's the extension of function fields, which is finite and separable as we are in characteristic zero).

Alternatively, the sheaf $\Omega_{W/V}$ is zero at the generic point of $W$ for the same reasons above, so its support is a proper closed subset $Z \subset W$. If we take $U = V- \overline{f(Z)}$, then the map $f^{-1}(U) \to U$ is unramified (and as above we can shrink further, if necessary, to get flatness).

Finally, to get finiteness, again we observe that $f^{-1}(\xi) \to \xi$ is finite, and since $\xi$ is the inverse limit over all nonempty open sets $U \subset V$, it follows that $f^{-1}(U) \to U$ is finite for some $U$. (This is a special case of the "noetherian descent" argument expounded at length in EGA IV-8.)

share|cite|improve this answer
Could you please explain what exactly you meant by "Then this follows because if $\xi$ is the generic point of $V$, $f^{-1}(\xi) \to \xi$ is a finite etale morphism"? – kalb Oct 11 '11 at 18:45
@kalb: In general, there are a bunch of results of the following kind: if $f: X \to Y$ is a morphism of finite presentation and $f^{-1}(\xi} \to \xi$ has some property (where $\xi$ is the generic point), then $f^{-1}(U) \to U$ has that property for $U$ an open neighborhood of $\xi$. One way to see this is to use the general formalism ("noetherian descent") that if $f_\alpha: X_\alpha \to Y_\alpha$ is a morphism of inverse systems of schemes, with the transition maps affine, then if $f: \varprojlim X_\alpha \to \varprojlim Y_\alpha$ has some property, then so does $f_\alpha$ – Akhil Mathew Oct 12 '11 at 3:14
...for $\alpha $ sufficiently large. In the case here, the point is that $\xi$ is the inverse limit of the open affine sets in $Y$. – Akhil Mathew Oct 12 '11 at 3:15

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.