Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have in mind not simply plane figures, but surfaces in 3-space. A case in point is the surfaces of the headlights of a vehicle, and the surfaces of its tail lights. There is obviously a correlation between them, although they are not similar in the strict geometric sense of the word. I would be surprised if some definite analytics/metrics hadn’t been applied, at least partially, to this question, and so I am tagging this as a reference-request.

share|improve this question
    
By "surfaces of headlights", do you mean the surfaces illuminated by the headlights? Or the shapes of the beams of light they emit? Or something else? –  Michael Hardy Oct 7 '11 at 22:27
    
I was referring to the components of the vehicle itself, specifically, to the exterior portion of the light itself. –  Mike Jones Oct 8 '11 at 6:00

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

There are many possible ways to compare shapes. Procrustes analysis is one of the simplest; a point distribution model is another simple one. Both use a chosen set of features to determine similarity.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you for your excellent answer, which I have up-voted and accepted. –  Mike Jones Oct 8 '11 at 6:05

A "correlation coefficient," properly speaking, is a measurement of the linear relation between two variables -- it's a very specific measure of similarity. Since there doesn't seem to be any indication that we expect the relation between various points on the surface of a headlight to be linear, I'm going to guess that you're actually asking about similarity measures in general.

The answer in this case is that there are lots of similarity measures between shapes, and different ones are better for different situations. Some of the main applications are in video compression, where we want to compress 2D images in a human-friendly way) and medical imaging (where we want to find topological features of 3D objects).

I'm not an expert by any means, but Googling "3D similarity measures" brings up several papers describing different similarity measures for 3D shapes in various contexts. You could start by looking through those and seeing if anything looks like what you want.

share|improve this answer
    
Yes, I thought it was obvious that I was using "correlation coefficient" in the wide sense to mean any appropriate quantitative measure of similarity. Although your answer is informative, I found the other answer even more so, but I'm up-voting yours as well. –  Mike Jones Oct 8 '11 at 6:05

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.