Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Does there exist a compact, nonempty subset of the rationals without isolated points ?

My motivation was the following: If so one could define a map $f$ from the set of all compact subsets of the rationals to itself that sends $K$ to $K\setminus Is(K)$ where $Is(K)$ denotes the set of all isolated points of $K$. Since $Is(K)$ is an open subset of $K$ the result is again compact. Then we can define $f^n$ for any ordinal number $n$ via $f^{n+1}=f\circ f^n$ and via $f^n:=\bigcap_{m\le n} f^m$ in the limit case. If every compact set has an isolated point it follows that for every $K$ there is a (smallest) ordinal $n$ such that $f^n(K)=\emptyset$. So we could measure the complexity of compact subsets of $Q$ with ordinal numbers.

share|improve this question
4  
No. A compact metric space without isolated points is uncountable (it must contain a homeomorphic copy of the Cantor set). Alternatively, use the Baire category theorem as explained in the second paragraph here. –  t.b. Oct 7 '11 at 12:32
    
Your method for measuring the complexity of compact subsets of $\mathbb Q$ is a good one. And well-known. (More generally, it can be used on countable compact spaces.) Congratulations on re-discovering it! –  GEdgar Oct 7 '11 at 14:47

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

A compact metric space is complete. Let $X$ be a complete metric space without isolated points. Since points are not isolated, they are nowhere dense. If $X$ were countable, it would be a countable union of nowhere dense subsets, contradicting the Baire category theorem.

It follows that a compact subset of $\mathbb{Q}$ must have isolated points.

This is essentially the same argument as given on the Wikipedia page here (second paragraph).


Your construction of a “measure of complexity” of the compact subsets of $\mathbb{Q}$ is a special case of the Cantor–Bendixson rank. Indeed it turns out that starting from a compact subset of $\mathbb{Q}$ the only possibility is that the process of throwing away the isolated points must terminate at the empty set.


Let me mention that the set of all compact subsets of $\mathbb{Q}$ has quite a complex structure. It can be naturally considered as a subset of the compact metric space $2^\mathbb{Q}$ in which it can be shown to be $\Pi^{1}_1$-complete, see e.g. this article. In particular, it is not a Borel set inside $2^{\mathbb{Q}}$. Thus it is a set of the same complexity as the set of everywhere differentiable functions inside $C[0,1])$ by a theorem of Mazurkiewicz.

Finally, let me point you to this thread here in which compact subsets of $\mathbb{Q}$ were discussed.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.