Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am trying to prove a simple group of order 168 has no subgroup of order 14, the hint ask me show how many Sylow 7 subgroup it has and what is the order of the normalizer of such Sylow 7 subgroup. I have showed there is 8 Sylow 7 subgroup and the order of its normalizer is 21. but I am not sure how is that related to show G has no subgroup of 14.

can anyone help? Thanks

share|cite|improve this question
Any group of order $14$ has a normal subgroup of order $7$, which is inconsistent with a Sylow $7$-normalizer having order $21$. – Derek Holt Mar 5 '14 at 17:33
Derek, excellent answer! +1 – Nicky Hekster Mar 5 '14 at 17:36
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Highlights (for you to check/prove):

Suppose $\;H\le G\;,\;\;|G|=168\;,\;\;G$ simple, $\;|H|=14\;$ , and let $\;P\le H\;,\;\;|P|=7\;$ , say $\;P=\langle p\rangle\;$.

Since $\;G\;$ cannot have an element of order $\;14\;^{(*)}$ , it must be that $\;H\cong D_{14}\;$ , from where we deduce that $\;\exists\,s\in H\;,\;\;ord(s)=2\;$ , s.t.

$$sps=p^{-1}\implies s\in N_G(P)$$

But this is impossible since $\;|N_G(P)|=21\;$ ...

$\;^{(*)}\;$ This is proved basically in the same way we reached the above contradiction...

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.