Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Krull's Hauptidealsatz (principal ideal theorem) says that for a Noetherian ring $R$ and any $r\in R$ which is not a unit or zero-divisor, all primes minimal over $(r)$ are of height 1. How badly can this fail if $R$ is a non-Noetherian ring? For example, if $R$ is non-Noetherian, is it possible for there to be a minimal prime over $(r)$ of infinite height?

EDIT: The answer is yes. See http://mathoverflow.net/questions/42510/how-badly-can-krulls-hauptidealsatz-fail-for-non-noetherian-rings

share|improve this question
    
you might want to "promote" this question to MO. It seems to be graduate/research level: e.g., I know a thing or two about commutative algebra but I don't know the answer to this offhand (I even looked in my own commutative algebra notes hopefully, but to no avail). –  Pete L. Clark Oct 17 '10 at 12:32
    
Done. Should I close here? –  Zev Chonoles Oct 17 '10 at 15:27
    
Told you you'd get an answer on MO. As for closing...I dunno what the convention is here. Maybe ask on meta? –  Pete L. Clark Oct 18 '10 at 0:07

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Valuation rings demonstrate quite clearly the failure of Krull's principal ideal theorem: take a valuation ring O of finite dimension. The prime ideals then form a chain

$p_0:=0\subset p_1\subset\ldots\subset p_d$

so that for every $i\in{1,\ldots ,d}$ there exists $r_i\in p_i\setminus p_{i-1}$. Obviously $p_i$ is a minimal prime over $r_iO$.

For valuation domains of infinite dimension one has to consider the so-called limit-primes: a prime ideal $p$ of a commutative ring $R$ is called limit-prime if

$p=\bigcup\limits_{q\in\mathrm{Spec} (R): q\subset p}q$.

There exist valuation domains $O$ of infinite Krull dimension such that the maximal ideal $m$ of $O$ is no limit-prime. For example take a valuation ring such that the corresponding value group is

$\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}\times\ldots$ (countably many factors ordered lexigraphically).

Then one can find $r\in m$ such that $m$ is minimal over $rO$.

H

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.