Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
  1. Let $(x_n)$ be a sequence that converges to the irrational number $x$. Must it be the case that $x_1, x_2, \dots$ are all irrational?

  2. Let $(y_n)$ be a sequences that converges to the rational number $y$. Must $y_1, y_2, \dots$ all be rational?

This was one of my midterm questions yesterday and I just wanted to clarify my responses. For (1), I said NO and as a counterexample, gave the sequence

$$ (x_n) = (3, 3.1, 3.14, 3.141, 3.1415, \dots) $$

that converges to $\pi$ (note that each $x_j \in \mathbb{Q}$ since it is a finite decimal expansion). For (2), I said YES but was not sure how to prove it.

Could anyone verify these responses and if I'm correct about (2), offer a proof for why it must be true.

share|cite|improve this question
Your answer to (1) is correct. You can give a counterexample to (2) with, for example, $\sqrt 2, 1,1,1,1,1,\ldots$ which converges to $1 \in \mathbb{Q}$. – Joshua Pepper Mar 4 '14 at 11:28

Both should be no. For (2), just divide by $\pi$ of your first example.

share|cite|improve this answer
+1 for your witty answer. – Hanul Jeon Mar 4 '14 at 12:25

Lemma 1: For any real number $x$, there exists a sequence of rational numbers $(x_n)$ such that $\lim (x_n) = x$.

Proof: take e.g. $x_n$ to be the decimal expansion of $x$ truncated to $n$ digits.

Lemma 2: For any real number $x$, there exists a sequence of irrational numbers $(y_n)$ such that $\lim (y_n) = x$.

Proof: The idea is to start with rationals and “tweak” them to be irrational without changing the limit. This is a common technique in analysis: take a sequence that converges where you want but doesn't have the property you want, and tweak it into another sequence with the same limit and with that desired property. Take $(x_n)$ from lemma $n$ and define $y_n = x_n + \frac{\sqrt 2}{n}$. Since $\sqrt 2$ is irrational, every $y_n$ is irrational. Since $\lim (x_n) = x$ and $\lim \big(\!\frac{\sqrt 2}{n}\!\big) = 0$, we have $\lim (y_n) = x$.

The property “for any $x$, there is a sequence that converges to $x$ and takes values in the set $S$” is known as “$S$ is dense”. These lemmas (which are a little stronger than the properties in your exercise) show respectively that $\mathbb Q$ and $\mathbb R \setminus \mathbb Q$ are dense in $\mathbb R$.

share|cite|improve this answer

For (1), observe how $\mathbb{R}$ is usually constructed - as the set of all finite limit points of sequences in $\mathbb{Q}$. So not only is (1) wrong, you have that for every $x \in \mathbb{R}$ there is a sequence $(a_n)$ contained in $\mathbb{Q}$ such that $\lim_{n\to\infty}a_n = x$.

For (2) - if that was true, then only sequences of rational numbers could converge to zero. Yet, rather obviously, $\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{\alpha}{n} = 0$ for every $\alpha \in \mathbb{R}$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Here's a set of numbers that approach $1$ and yet are all irrational:


share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.