Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Here's what i know (or think i know) about the factoring.

For integer $n> 1 $

1) If $n$ is a positive power of $2$ then it is irreducible.

2) If $n$ is an odd prime then $$x^n + y^n = (x + y)(x^{n-1} - x^{n-2}y + \cdots - xy^{n-2} + y^{n-1} ) $$

3) If $n$ has an odd prime factor then it is factorable but the factorization is more complicated , for example $x^{14} + y^{14}$ has 2 distinct irreducible factors and $x^{15} + y^{15}$ has $4$ distinct irreducible factors.

Is there a connection between the prime factorization of $n$ and the number of distinct irreducible factors of $x^n + y^n$ ?

Is there a connection between $n$, AND the number of distinct irreducible factors , AND the highest power occurring in each factor? Example:

$$x^{15} + y^{15} = (x + y)(x^2 - \cdots)(x^4 - \cdots)(x^8 + \cdots)$$

In other words , i'm also asking if there is a connection between $n = 15$ , the number of factors $4$ , and the powers $\{1 , 2 , 4 , 8\}$

For this particular example the numbers work out nicely but i'm not sure the pattern is so obvious in general.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

share|improve this question
1  
I think you are looking for factorization over the rationals (or integers). The Wikipedia article on cyclotomic polynomials may be useful. –  André Nicolas Mar 1 at 18:14
    
Thanx for the wiki link. You are mostly right about the integer part but i have derived some factorizations like $$x^4 + 1 = (x^2 + \sqrt{2}x + 1)(x^2 - \sqrt{2}x + 1)$$ This example is the simplest that comes to mind but there are many others. I get the feeling that root 2 somehow disqualifies this as a legitimate factorization but i'm not sure exactly why. That is why i asked over the reals , to allow these kind of factorings but they may be inappropriate , i don't know. :) –  neofoxmulder Mar 1 at 19:33
1  
Over the reals things are simple, since $x^n+y^n$ factors as a product of polynomials that are of degree at most $2$. All of degree $2$ if $n$ is even, all but one of degree $2$ if $n$ is odd. –  André Nicolas Mar 1 at 19:38

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

First, see Way to show $x^n + y^n = z^n$ factorises as $(x + y)(x + \zeta y) \cdots (x + \zeta^{n-1}y) = z^n$.

Since we have this factorisation, we need to know in what minimal way we need to combine the $n$th roots of unity so that we have a polynomial over the integers again. Well, if we multiply together all the primitive $d$th roots of unity terms for all $d\mid n$, that's what we want. There are $\phi(d)$ primitive $d$th roots of unity.

Hence you will have $\#\{1\leq d<n:d\mid n\}$ irreducible factors of degrees $\phi(d)$.

In your case, we have $1,3,5,15\mid 15$, and $\phi(1)=1,\phi(3)=2,\phi(5)=4,\phi(15)=8$.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanx for the answer and the link both are very helpful. I applied your method to $x^{35} + y^{35} $ and was able to make it work so i'm glad i understand it. :) –  neofoxmulder Mar 1 at 19:05
1  
Things work nicely for $n$ odd, since we are essentially dealing with $t^n-1$. There are some complications for even $n$. –  André Nicolas Mar 1 at 19:43
    
@AndréNicolas , Oh? can you give a numerical example of even n so i could try and work it out to see what happens? –  neofoxmulder Mar 1 at 20:05
    
Do you just want an even number or do you want a worked example? –  Ian Coley Mar 1 at 20:07
    
@IanColey , i tried $$x^{14} + y^{14}$$ but your algorithm doesn't seem to work , unless WA is incorrect. wolframalpha.com/input/?i=factor%28x%5E14+%2B+y%5E14%29 Note: I am not trying to factor these by hand , plug and play using CAS. :) –  neofoxmulder Mar 1 at 20:26

Is there a connection between $n=15$, the number of factors $4$, and the powers $\{1,2,4,8\}$

For $n=2^{2^k}-1=\displaystyle\sum_{j=0}^{2^k-1}2^j$ , we have $\dfrac{x^n+y^n}{x+y}=\dfrac{x^{2^{2^k}-1}+y^{2^{2^k}-1}}{x+y}=\displaystyle\prod_{j=1}^{2^k-1}\Big(x^{2^j}\pm\ldots\Big)$. Here, $k=2$, and $n=15$. The cases $k<4$ are less than a few lines in length, while $k=4$ occupies about $40$ screens of resolution $1366\times768$. :-)

share|improve this answer
    
I had a feeling n = 15 = 16 - 1 was special , thanx. These formulas are beautiful :) –  neofoxmulder Mar 1 at 20:12

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.