Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Trying to do this one:

Suppose $A$ is an invertible $n$ x $n$ matrix and the vectors $v_1$, $v_2$, ..., $v_n$ are linearly independent. Show that the vectors $Av_1$, $Av_2$, ..., $Av_n$ are linearly independent.

I know that A's column vectors are linearly independent since A is invertible. I also know there is no relation amongst the $v_i$ because they're linearly independent.

My idea is to write the product of A and a given $v_i$ in terms of the columns of A. Not sure if this is right, any guidance much appreciated!

Thanks, Mariogs

share|cite|improve this question
Maybe you can do a proof by contradiction? If they are lin dependent, then the zero vector can be written as a lin combination (with nonzero scalars) of your $Av's$ That means that a particular $Av$ vector can be written as a lin combination of the remaining $Av's$. Now what does that mean? – imranfat Feb 27 '14 at 16:33
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Let $w_i=Av_i$ for $i=1,\dots,n$. To show linear independence, we must show that $$ c_1w_1+\cdots+c_nw_n=0 \Longrightarrow c_i=0,\quad i=1,\dots n.$$ Since $A$ is invertible, we can left-multiply $c_1w_1+\dots=0$ by $A^{-1}$ to get...

Can you take it from there? Remember that the vectors $v_1,\dots v_n$ are linearly independent.

share|cite|improve this answer
Ah this makes sense to me, thanks! – bclayman Feb 27 '14 at 16:56
To finish it: We multiply on the left by $A^-1$ and get $c_1 v_1$ + ... + $c1 v_n$ = 0. Since $v_1, ..., v_n$ are linearly independent, we must have $c_i$ = 0 for all i. Yes? – bclayman Feb 27 '14 at 17:00
That's right, yes. – user12477 Mar 3 '14 at 12:05

Notice that since $A$ is invertible then $$Ax=0\iff x=0$$ Now let $a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n\in \Bbb R$ such that $$\sum_{k=1}^na_k Av_k=0\iff A\left(\sum_{k=1}^na_k v_k\right)=0\iff \sum_{k=1}^na_k v_k=0\Rightarrow a_i=0\;\forall i$$ since $v_1$, $v_2$, ..., $v_n$ are linearly independent. Conclude.

share|cite|improve this answer
Whoa! You've been busy with answers! – amWhy Feb 28 '14 at 13:34

Why not use the definition directly? Justify/explain the following:

$$\text{For scalars}\;\;c_1,...,c_n\;:\;\;0=\sum_{k=1}^nc_kAv_k=\sum_{k=1}^nA(c_kv_k)=A\left(\sum_{k=1}^nc_kv_k\right)\iff$$

$$\iff\sum_{k=1}^nc_kv_k=0\iff c_1=c_2=\ldots=c_n=0$$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.